Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield
ESRS disclosure: ESRS ESRS 2 \ DR GOV-5
Tags Tree
- Provide a comprehensive description of the scope, main features, and components of your organization's risk management and internal control processes and systems as they pertain to sustainability reporting.
-
Question Id: GOV-5_01
Sustainability risks are integrated in the global Group ERM framework, which provides a specific risk governance and control framework. Related policies and action plans described in the Sustainability Statement reflect the updates made by the Group to mitigate these risks and the associated performance indicators are disclosed. The Group internal control system covers all of the Group’s activities including sustainability. Additionally, as part of its sustainability roadmap, URW has set up a strong and structured governance. The reporting protocol defines the methodology for calculating the environmental, social and societal indicators of the Group. This reporting protocol provides consistent guidance and rules for all Group entities in terms of organisation and indicator definitions. It ensures the continuity of the reporting process and the reported information in case of changes in the reporting teams and the auditability by the independent third party. Annually, the Sustainability Performance Management team keeps the sustainability reporting scope up to date, reflecting the Group’s portfolio evolutions. Sustainability reporting relies on two main tools: the HR Information System and the Sustainability Reporting Tool. The HR Information System is managed by Group HR teams and is used to collect HR related information throughout the Group. The Sustainability Reporting Tool is the main platform for collecting sustainability data at URW. It is linked to other internal Group tools that provide relevant data. Every year, an Annual Reporting Campaign shares useful information on the Sustainability Reporting Tool, important deadlines and how the data will be used. The process, which is communicated before the campaign, describes steps for contributors and validators to report their non-financial data through the URW Sustainability Reporting Tool. User guides are provided to explain the process in detail, including how to use the Sustainability Reporting Tool and their responsibility for gathering and entering the required non-financial data.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 90%
- Provide a detailed account of the risk assessment approach employed, specifically outlining the methodology used for risk prioritization, as per Disclosure Requirement GOV–5 concerning risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting.
-
Question Id: GOV-5_02
In 2023, in anticipation of the EU CSRD, the Group conducted a double materiality analysis covering all URW’s activities, including Viparis. The sustainability topics were defined on the basis of the sustainability priorities highlighted by the Group’s simple materiality analysis (2022 version), the climate risk assessment, the supply chain risk assessment and a benchmark of sustainability topics covered by real estate companies to identify megatrends and sector impacts. The results of the double materiality analysis were integrated to the Group risk management process as reflected in section 6.2.2.C Category #3 Environmental and social responsibility risks. Climate change risks for the Group (physical and transitional) form a core part of the sustainability risks analysis and are integrated in the double materiality analysis. A more detailed overview of climate risk management and, in particular, of the resilience of assets to physical climate risks is provided in section 3.2.2.B.12 Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed account of the primary risks identified in your sustainability reporting processes and the strategies implemented to mitigate these risks, including any related control measures.
-
Question Id: GOV-5_03
The sustainability topics were defined on the basis of the sustainability priorities highlighted by the Group’s simple materiality analysis (2022 version), the climate risk assessment, the supply chain risk assessment and a benchmark of sustainability topics covered by real estate companies to identify megatrends and sector impacts. The results of the double materiality analysis were integrated to the Group risk management process as reflected in section 6.2.2.C Category #3 Environmental and social responsibility risks. Climate change risks for the Group (physical and transitional) form a core part of the sustainability risks analysis and are integrated in the double materiality analysis. A more detailed overview of climate risk management and, in particular, of the resilience of assets to physical climate risks is provided in section 3.2.2.B.12 Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of how your organization incorporates the findings from its risk assessment and internal controls concerning the sustainability reporting process into its relevant internal functions and processes.
-
Question Id: GOV-5_04
The Sustainability Reporting Tool is the main platform for collecting sustainability data at URW. It is linked to other internal Group tools that provide relevant data. Every year, an Annual Reporting Campaign shares useful information on the Sustainability Reporting Tool, important deadlines and how the data will be used. The process, which is communicated before the campaign, describes steps for contributors and validators to report their non-financial data through the URW Sustainability Reporting Tool. User guides are provided to explain the process in detail, including how to use the Sustainability Reporting Tool and their responsibility for gathering and entering the required non-financial data. Every year, the Sustainability Reporting Tool’s settings are revised to reflect the changes in KPIs, contributors and validators. This step is essential as it ensures that relevant contributors are given ownership and held accountable for the data they provide to the tool, based on their specific asset or department. Validators, meanwhile, play a key role in this process. They oversee the correctness of the data entered by the contributors and ensuring the completeness of the reported data. This systematic approach promotes accuracy, accountability and completeness in URW’s data reporting process.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 80%
- Provide a detailed account of the periodic reporting of findings from risk assessments and internal controls over sustainability reporting to the administrative, management, and supervisory bodies, as outlined in Disclosure Requirement GOV–5.
-
Question Id: GOV-5_05
Sustainability is a core component of URW’s strategy and is at the heart of the Group business model. Sustainability topics are addressed at the SB level in plenary sessions, given its importance and the willingness to associate all SB members in these discussions. Sustainability updates are shared before each SB meeting, and ESG is discussed in depth throughout the year in the presence of the MB and the Group Director of Sustainability, including during the annual strategic seminar, the onboarding programmes of both the SB and MB, and as often as necessary during trainings. In 2023, the SB and the MB respectively met 6 and 12 times to discuss topics linked to the Better Places roadmap. In 2023, the SB dedicated half a day to a sustainability roadmap workshop where the SB and the MB discussed (i) URW’s ambition to embed sustainability at the core of its business model, (ii) sustainability performance against existing targets as well as credential to lead the environment transition, (iii) ongoing transformation and concrete achievements, (iv) the key building blocks of the updated Better Places roadmap and (v) Group sustainability organisation and governance.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%