Has the undertaking identified material impacts concerning the state of species, and if so, can it report metrics deemed relevant? Specifically, can the undertaking disclose metrics on species at extinction risk that measure changes in the relevant habitat for a threatened species, serving as a proxy for the undertaking's impact on the local population's extinction risk?

Question

Accepted Answer

The table below contains the performance of the reporting year against the Group’s objective:
| URW objectives | Performance |
|----------------|-------------|
| 100% new development projects to achieve a biodiversity net gain | 2023 |
| 100% of standing assets to implement renaturation projects by 2030 | N/A |
URW internal policies:
| URW internal policies | Performance |
|----------------------|-------------|
| 100% development projects to implement a biodiversity action plan | 2023 |
| 100% standing assets with high biodiversity stakes to implement a biodiversity action plan | 100% |

Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield

ESRS disclosure: E4-5_23

Tags Tree

URW objectives	Performance
100% new development projects to achieve a biodiversity net gain	2023
100% of standing assets to implement renaturation projects by 2030	N/A

URW internal policies	Performance
100% development projects to implement a biodiversity action plan	2023
100% standing assets with high biodiversity stakes to implement a biodiversity action plan	100%