Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1.SBM-3
Tags Tree
- Provide an explanation for each identified material climate-related risk, specifying whether the entity classifies the risk as a climate-related physical risk or a climate-related transition risk, in accordance with the Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 concerning material impacts, risks, and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model.
-
Question Id: E1.SBM-3_01
Climate-related physical risks are defined as a combination of hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and impact. They are classified into acute and chronic risks. Acute risks refer to hazards that are event-driven, such as cyclones, droughts, or floods. Chronic risks refer to long-term shifts in climate patterns that may cause the continuous evolution in climate variables such as increase in average temperatures, sea level rise, water stress, etc. Transition risks and opportunities are those associated with the pace and extent at which an organisation manages and adapts to the internal and external pace of change to reduce GHG emissions and transition to renewable energy. Transition risks include policy and legal risks, technology risk, market risk, and reputation risk. Transition opportunities include resource efficiency and energy source.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 50%
- Provide a detailed account of the resilience of your strategy and business model concerning climate change. Include a comprehensive description of the scope of the resilience analysis as per the Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3, focusing on material impacts, risks, and opportunities and their interaction with your strategy and business model.
-
Question Id: E1.SBM-3_02
The resilience analysis is conducted in alignment with various regulations and sustainability frameworks such as the EU Taxonomy and the TCFD. For climate-related physical risks, the set of indicators studied, as well as the time horizons (baseline, 2030, 2050) and the scenarios (SSP2-4.5, SSP5-8.5) chosen as part of the study are aligned with the various regulatory requirements and recommendations (EU Taxonomy, CDP, TCFD and CSRD among others). For the transition risks and opportunities component, the choice of time horizons (2025, 2030, 2050) and scenarios – Nationally Determined Scenario ("NDCs") which corresponds to business as usual and net zero 2050 – followed the same logic.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 80%
- Provide a detailed account of the resilience analysis conducted on your strategy and business model concerning climate change. Include specifics on the timing and methodology of the analysis, particularly the application of climate scenario analysis as outlined in the Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 and its associated application requirement paragraphs.
-
Question Id: E1.SBM-3_03
The resilience analysis is conducted in alignment with various regulations and sustainability frameworks such as the EU Taxonomy and the TCFD. For climate-related physical risks, the set of indicators studied, as well as the time horizons (baseline, 2030, 2050) and the scenarios (SSP2-4.5, SSP5-8.5) chosen as part of the study are aligned with the various regulatory requirements and recommendations (EU Taxonomy, CDP, TCFD and CSRD among others). For the transition risks and opportunities component, the choice of time horizons (2025, 2030, 2050) and scenarios – Nationally Determined Scenario ("NDCs") which corresponds to business as usual and net zero 2050 – followed the same logic.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed explanation of the time horizons applied in your resilience analysis, ensuring alignment with the climate and business scenarios used to determine material physical and transition risks, as well as in setting GHG emissions reduction targets. This disclosure should correspond to the requirements outlined in paragraphs AR 11 to AR 12 and should be consistent with the information reported under Disclosure Requirement E1-4.
-
Question Id: E1.SBM-3_05
The timeframes are considered, consistent with the expected lifetime of the activity and the indications of the EU Taxonomy and CSRD: Baseline: average 1981 and 2010 – To understand current exposure; 2030: average between 2021 and 2040 – This timeframe is commonly used for defining climate adaptation planning and budgets; 2050: average between 2035 and 2064 – This timeframe is commonly used for strategic decisions, such as changing the business model or the geographic presence and long-term investments, such as building a new site.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the resilience of your strategy and business model concerning climate change. This account should encompass the outcomes of the resilience analysis, incorporating results derived from scenario analysis, as stipulated under Disclosure Requirement ESRS 2 SBM-3 regarding material impacts, risks, and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model.
-
Question Id: E1.SBM-3_06
The resilience analysis is conducted in alignment with various regulations and sustainability frameworks such as the EU Taxonomy and the TCFD. For climate-related physical risks, the set of indicators studied, as well as the time horizons (baseline, 2030, 2050) and the scenarios (SSP2-4.5, SSP5-8.5) chosen as part of the study are aligned with the various regulatory requirements and recommendations (EU Taxonomy, CDP, TCFD and CSRD among others). For the transition risks and opportunities component, the choice of time horizons (2025, 2030, 2050) and scenarios – Nationally Determined Scenario ("NDCs") which corresponds to business as usual and net zero 2050 – followed the same logic.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 80%
- Provide a detailed explanation of your company's capacity to modify or adapt its strategy and business model in response to climate change over the short, medium, and long term. This should include an assessment of your ability to maintain access to finance at a reasonable cost of capital, the potential to redeploy, upgrade, or decommission existing assets, the capability to shift your products and services portfolio, and the initiatives to reskill your workforce. This disclosure should align with the resilience analysis results as required under paragraph 19 (c) and should address the anticipated financial effects from significant physical and transition risks, as well as potential climate-related opportunities, in accordance with Disclosure Requirement E1-9 and ESRS 2 SBM-3.
-
Question Id: E1.SBM-3_07
The concept of climate resilience involves organisations developing adaptive capacity to respond to climate change to better manage the associated risks and seize opportunities, including the ability to respond to transition risks and physical risks. Opportunities include improving efficiency, designing new production processes and developing new products. Opportunities related to resilience may be especially relevant for organisations with long-lived fixed assets or extensive supply or distribution networks; those that depend critically on utility and infrastructure networks or natural resources in their value chain; and those that may require longer-term financing and investment.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 45%