Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield
ESRS disclosure
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of the processes your organization employs to identify and assess material impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems. Specifically, disclose whether and how consultations with affected communities were conducted during sustainability assessments of shared biological resources and ecosystems. Additionally, elucidate how these communities were involved in the materiality assessment, particularly when they are likely to be impacted.
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_07
The Group's biodiversity strategy involves stakeholders such as the Group sustainability team, corporate technical team, and local country teams. However, specific consultations with affected communities and their involvement in materiality assessment are not explicitly detailed.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed account of the processes your organization employs to identify and evaluate material impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems. Specifically, elucidate whether and how consultations with affected communities were conducted concerning sustainability assessments of shared biological resources and ecosystems. In relation to your operations, specify how negative impacts on ecosystem services relevant to these communities may be avoided. If avoidance is not feasible, outline your plans to minimize such impacts and describe any mitigation measures intended to preserve the value and functionality of priority services.
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_08
The Group's biodiversity strategy involves stakeholders such as the Group sustainability team, corporate technical team, and local country teams. However, specific consultations with affected communities and plans to avoid or minimize negative impacts are not explicitly detailed.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed description of the processes your company employs to identify and assess material biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities. Include in your response whether and how consultations with affected communities were conducted regarding sustainability assessments of shared biological resources and ecosystems. Specifically, address how your operations impact ecosystem services relevant to these communities. If negative impacts are unavoidable, outline your plans to minimize these impacts and detail the mitigation measures implemented to maintain the value and functionality of priority services.
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_09
The Group's biodiversity strategy involves stakeholders such as the Group sustainability team, corporate technical team, and local country teams. However, specific consultations with affected communities and plans to minimize impacts are not explicitly detailed.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Has the undertaking utilized biodiversity and ecosystems scenario analysis to inform the identification and assessment of material risks and opportunities over short-, medium-, and long-term time horizons? If so, provide a detailed account of the processes employed to verify the business model(s) using a range of biodiversity and ecosystems scenarios, or other scenarios that model biodiversity and ecosystems-related consequences, with different possible pathways.
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_10
The Group's biodiversity strategy includes an assessment of material impacts, risks, and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model. However, specific use of scenario analysis is not explicitly detailed.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed explanation of the rationale behind the selection of the scenarios considered in your biodiversity and ecosystems scenario analysis, as part of the process to identify and assess material biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities over short-, medium-, and long-term time horizons, in accordance with ESRS 2 IRO-1.
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_11
The Group's biodiversity strategy includes an assessment of material impacts, risks, and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model. However, specific rationale behind scenario selection is not explicitly detailed.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed account of the processes your organization employs to identify and assess material impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems. Specifically, if scenario analysis has been utilized, disclose the methodology by which these scenarios are updated in response to evolving conditions and emerging trends over short-, medium-, and long-term time horizons.
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_12
The Group's biodiversity strategy includes an assessment of material impacts, risks, and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model. However, specific methodology for updating scenarios is not explicitly detailed.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Has the undertaking utilized biodiversity and ecosystems scenario analysis to inform the identification and assessment of material risks and opportunities across short-, medium-, and long-term time horizons? If so, provide details on whether these scenarios are informed by expectations published by authoritative intergovernmental bodies, such as the Convention for Biological Diversity, and where relevant, by scientific consensus, such as that expressed by the Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_13
The Group's biodiversity strategy includes an assessment of material impacts, risks, and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model. However, specific details on scenario analysis informed by authoritative bodies are not explicitly detailed.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Does the undertaking have sites located in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas? Additionally, do activities related to these sites contribute to the deterioration of natural habitats, the habitats of species, or disturb species within designated protected areas?
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_14
The Group applies a pragmatic approach to biodiversity at its standing assets, which are considered HBS if located within 1.5 km from a protected area in Europe. The Group's assets are composed of all the IUCN and Bird Life International protection areas.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 65%
- Does your company have sites located in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas, and do activities related to these sites negatively impact these areas by causing deterioration of natural habitats, habitats of species, or disturbance to species for which a protected area has been designated?
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_15
The Group applies a pragmatic approach to biodiversity at its standing assets, which are considered HBS if located within 1.5 km from a protected area in Europe. The Group's assets are composed of all the IUCN and Bird Life International protection areas.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Has the undertaking determined the necessity to implement biodiversity mitigation measures, as outlined in the relevant directives and standards, including Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds, Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, and Environmental Impact Assessments as per Directive 2011/92/EU, or equivalent provisions for activities in third countries, such as the IFC Performance Standard 6?
-
Question Id: E4.IRO-1_16
The Group includes in its sustainability guidelines the requirements related to the Do Not Significant Harm criteria for biodiversity within the EU Taxonomy regulation. An EIA or screening is completed in accordance with Directive 2011/92/EU.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%