Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield
ESRS disclosure
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of how your organization contributes to addressing biodiversity and ecosystem impact drivers. Include potential mitigation actions aligned with the mitigation hierarchy, and specify any main path-dependencies and locked-in assets and resources, such as plants or raw materials, that are associated with changes in biodiversity and ecosystems. This information should be part of your transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems within your strategy and business model, as required under Disclosure Requirement E4-6 regarding anticipated financial effects from material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities.
-
Question Id: E4-1_11
The Group's study identified impacts such as land artificialisation, degradation & fragmentation, degradation of habitats from material production, water consumption, wood and other bio-based material consumption, all greenhouse gases emissions, plant protection (phytosanitary) products, light pollution, single-use plastics used by tenants and visitors, and vegetation choice and maintenance. Dependencies include attractiveness (biophilia), climate regulation (trees cooling down space, vegetal areas reducing "urban heat islands", mitigating extreme weather events), risk mitigations (non-artificialised spaces absorbing rainwater), and resources supply (materials for construction, resources for tenants). These commitments are detailed in the following sections.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of any objectives or plans your company has for aligning its economic activities, specifically revenues and capital expenditures (CapEx), with the criteria set forth in the delegated regulations on biodiversity under the Taxonomy Regulation. This should include any transition plans and considerations of biodiversity and ecosystems within your strategy and business model, as required by Disclosure Requirement E4-6 regarding anticipated financial effects from material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities.
-
Question Id: E4-1_13
The Group includes in its sustainability guidelines the requirements related to the Do not Significant Harm ("DNSH") criteria for biodiversity within the EU Taxonomy regulation. In this respect the following criteria are followed by the Group's development projects: An EIA or screening is completed in accordance with Directive 2011/92/EU34. Where an EIA has been carried out, the required mitigation and compensation measures for protecting the environment are implemented. For sites/operations located in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas (including the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, UNESCO World Heritage sites and Key Biodiversity Areas, as well as other protected areas), an appropriate assessment, where applicable, has been conducted and based on its conclusions the necessary mitigation measures are implemented.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%
- Does the company's transition plan incorporate biodiversity offsets, and if so, where are these offsets intended to be utilized, what is their extent in relation to the overall transition plan, and has the mitigation hierarchy been considered?
-
Question Id: E4-1_14
In case of loss of Biodiversity Units, the Group will have the possibility to finance compensation projects creating enough Biodiversity Units off site to raise the project's balance to a biodiversity net gain. The requirement has been added in the 2023 update of the sustainability guidelines for development projects.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 65%
- Provide a detailed explanation of the management process for implementing and updating the transition plan, specifically in relation to anticipated financial effects from material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities, as outlined in Disclosure Requirement E4-6 and E4-1.
-
Question Id: E4-1_15
URW, through the implementation of its environmental management system ("EMS") and sustainability guidelines, ensures that all development projects, whatever their size or type, are designed in the most sustainable way in the long term and in accordance with the Group sustainability strategy. For each project, the EMS covers all 4 stages of the development process and involves several departments, notably Development, Security, Technical, Operations, Leasing and on-site shopping centre management teams.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 50%
- Indicate the metrics and methodologies utilized to measure progress within the transition plan concerning biodiversity and ecosystems, as required by Disclosure Requirement E4-6 regarding anticipated financial effects from material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities, and Disclosure Requirement E4-1 concerning the integration of biodiversity and ecosystems in the strategy and business model.
-
Question Id: E4-1_16
All concerned projects started from 2022 onwards will use the "Biodiversity Metric 3.0" methodology, created by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in the UK ("DEFRA"). This methodology was created to "calculate a biodiversity baseline and to forecast biodiversity losses and gains on site or off site resulting from development or land management changes", according to DEFRA.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed description of whether and how your company's biodiversity and ecosystems-related policies are aligned with the matters specified in ESRS E4 AR 4.
-
Question Id: E4-2_01
The policies include a mapping of URW’s material impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems and a description of the main drivers for biodiversity loss as identified by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (“IPBES”) in 2019. As GHG emissions represent the main impact of URW on biodiversity, two climate-related policies have been added in the table below.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 65%
- Provide a detailed explanation of whether and how your organization's biodiversity and ecosystems-related policies are connected to its material impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems.
-
Question Id: E4-2_02
The policies include a mapping of URW’s material impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems and a description of the main drivers for biodiversity loss as identified by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (“IPBES”) in 2019. As GHG emissions represent the main impact of URW on biodiversity, two climate-related policies have been added in the table below.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed explanation of whether and how your company's biodiversity and ecosystems-related policies are connected to material dependencies, as well as material physical and transition risks and opportunities.
-
Question Id: E4-2_03
The policies include a mapping of URW’s material impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems and a description of the main drivers for biodiversity loss as identified by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (“IPBES”) in 2019. As GHG emissions represent the main impact of URW on biodiversity, two climate-related policies have been added in the table below.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 65%
- Provide a detailed explanation of whether and how your organization's biodiversity and ecosystems-related policies facilitate the traceability of products, components, and raw materials that have significant actual or potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems throughout the value chain.
-
Question Id: E4-2_04
The Group applies a pragmatic approach on biodiversity to its standing assets. Even though the dense urban locations of most assets severely limit the potential to enhance biodiversity, the Group’s sites are committed to retaining and improving local biodiversity. This translates in the implementation in 2022 of biodiversity action plans in all High Biodiversity Stakes (“HBS”) assets in Europe. Assets are considered HBS if located within 1.5 km from a protected area in Europe. These areas are composed of all the IUCN (management categories I to VI) and Bird Life International (Key Biodiversity Areas) protection areas. As for the creation of the biodiversity action plans of development projects, these standing assets must appoint a qualified ecologist to assess the on-site biodiversity and propose an adaptation action plan to preserve and improve the state of local nature. In the US, biodiversity audits will progressively be deployed in the context of the BREEAM In-Use certification of the US assets.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 30%
- Provide a detailed explanation of whether and how your company's biodiversity and ecosystems-related policies address production, sourcing, or consumption from ecosystems that are managed to maintain or enhance conditions for biodiversity. Include information on the regular monitoring and reporting of biodiversity status and any gains or losses.
-
Question Id: E4-2_05
The preliminary studies of the Group biodiversity strategy showed that one of the main drivers of biodiversity loss, according to the 2019 IPBES report, is the change in land use. It also showed that real estate companies play a major role in this driver due to the artificialisation, degradation and fragmentation of land operated in greenfield projects. In the context of its biodiversity strategy, URW decided to commit to limiting these impacts by aiming to achieve a biodiversity net gain between the state of the site before and after the construction in all large projects. In order to reach this target, all concerned projects started from 2022 onwards will use the “Biodiversity Metric 3.0” methodology, created by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in the UK (“DEFRA”). This methodology was created to “calculate a biodiversity baseline and to forecast biodiversity losses and gains on site or off site resulting from development or land management changes”, according to DEFRA. The Group will also make its best efforts to apply this target to its ongoing projects where it is possible.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 80%