Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield
ESRS disclosure
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of the process employed to identify, assess, prioritize, and monitor potential and actual impacts on individuals and the environment. This should be informed by the undertaking's due diligence process. Specifically, elucidate whether and how this process incorporates consultation with affected stakeholders to comprehend their potential impacts, as well as engagement with external experts.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_05
URW initiated a consultation process involving approximately 20 internal and external stakeholders. The selection of external stakeholders was carried out to ensure a representation of key value chain players for URW. The external stakeholders were: consumer rights organisations, sustainability in real estate experts, representatives from retailers’ associations, as well as significant partners, such as construction companies, with whom URW has collaborated on major projects.
In addition to these external consultations, dialogues were held with internal stakeholders representing various teams and geographies across the Group. These internal stakeholders included members from the Compliance, Operating Management, Development, Sustainability, People and the MPPS departments, along with a member of the MB. Internal consultations actively considered the different activities of the Group and its different subsidiaries, from the core business of retail (Shopping Centres) to mixed-use and offices (Offices), as well as Convention & Exhibition centres. Internal discussions served to supplement and critically evaluate the preliminary drafts of the materiality analysis, thereby ensuring a robust and comprehensive review process.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed explanation of the process your organization employs to identify, assess, prioritize, and monitor potential and actual impacts on people and the environment. This should be informed by your due diligence process and include an account of how negative impacts are prioritized based on their relative severity and likelihood. Additionally, if applicable, describe how positive impacts are prioritized based on their relative scale, scope, and likelihood. Clarify how these processes determine which sustainability matters are deemed material for reporting purposes, referencing any qualitative or quantitative thresholds and other criteria as outlined in ESRS 1 section 3.4 on Impact Materiality.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_06
The purpose of this double materiality assessment was to assess the materiality of sustainability and ESG topics from 2 complementary perspectives:
An “impact” perspective, i.e., the negative or positive impacts of the Company and its activities on the environment, the people it works with and the communities it operates in. It considered the scale (level of criticality of the issue), the scope (value chain and affected stakeholders), the remediability (ability to mitigate the impact), as well as the likelihood of the impact.
A “financial” perspective, i.e., the risks or opportunities that environmental and social issues represent for the Company’s activity and value. It considered the Company’s dependencies towards business relations and stakeholders (i.e., financial partners, tenants or suppliers), as well as the continuity of use or access to resources that are essential for the Company to operate and grow (e.g., raw materials, retention of key talents or development of stricter regulations). The materiality of risks and opportunities has been assessed based on the likelihood of occurrence and the potential magnitude of the financial effects. The financial thresholds considered for the analysis were aligned with the financial impact scales used for the Group risk mapping.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 80%
- Provide a comprehensive overview of the process employed to identify, assess, prioritize, and monitor risks and opportunities that may have financial effects. Include a detailed description of the methodologies and criteria used in this process, ensuring clarity on how material impacts are determined and managed.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_07
URW pursued a study of international and sectoral ESG frameworks to understand how sustainability topics impact the Company’s business in terms of risks and opportunities. These sector-specific ESG standards provided detailed information on the financial impact of environmental and social issues on the business model. Complementary frameworks provided URW with a structured approach for assessing the likelihood, magnitude and nature of the effects of identified risks and opportunities, through the lens of the continuity of use or access to resources by URW as well as the Group’s dependence towards business relations. This phase involved evaluating the potential financial implications of each risk and opportunity for URW, considering their probability of occurrence, and understanding their potential impact on the Company’s operations, reputation, as well as its short, medium and long-term prospects. The financial implications were determined in the context of the Group’s risk mapping thresholds. This comprehensive assessment allowed URW to have a preliminary view of which topics were deemed more material for the Company.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the methodology employed to identify, evaluate, prioritize, and monitor risks and opportunities with potential financial implications. Include an explanation of how the organization has integrated the relationships between its impacts and dependencies with the risks and opportunities that may emerge from these impacts and dependencies.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_08
URW pursued a study of international and sectoral ESG frameworks to understand how sustainability topics impact the Company’s business in terms of risks and opportunities. These sector-specific ESG standards provided detailed information on the financial impact of environmental and social issues on the business model. Complementary frameworks provided URW with a structured approach for assessing the likelihood, magnitude and nature of the effects of identified risks and opportunities, through the lens of the continuity of use or access to resources by URW as well as the Group’s dependence towards business relations. This phase involved evaluating the potential financial implications of each risk and opportunity for URW, considering their probability of occurrence, and understanding their potential impact on the Company’s operations, reputation, as well as its short, medium and long-term prospects. The financial implications were determined in the context of the Group’s risk mapping thresholds. This comprehensive assessment allowed URW to have a preliminary view of which topics were deemed more material for the Company.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the methodology employed to identify, assess, prioritize, and monitor risks and opportunities that could potentially impact financial outcomes. This disclosure must encompass an explanation of how the likelihood, magnitude, and nature of the effects of identified risks and opportunities are evaluated, including any qualitative or quantitative thresholds and criteria utilized, as stipulated by ESRS 1 section 3.5 on Financial Materiality.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_09
URW pursued a study of international and sectoral ESG frameworks to understand how sustainability topics impact the Company’s business in terms of risks and opportunities. These sector-specific ESG standards provided detailed information on the financial impact of environmental and social issues on the business model. Complementary frameworks provided URW with a structured approach for assessing the likelihood, magnitude and nature of the effects of identified risks and opportunities, through the lens of the continuity of use or access to resources by URW as well as the Group’s dependence towards business relations. This phase involved evaluating the potential financial implications of each risk and opportunity for URW, considering their probability of occurrence, and understanding their potential impact on the Company’s operations, reputation, as well as its short, medium and long-term prospects. The financial implications were determined in the context of the Group’s risk mapping thresholds. This comprehensive assessment allowed URW to have a preliminary view of which topics were deemed more material for the Company.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the methodology employed to identify, evaluate, prioritize, and monitor risks and opportunities with potential financial implications. Specifically, elucidate how sustainability-related risks are prioritized in comparison to other risk categories, including the application of risk-assessment tools.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_10
URW pursued a study of international and sectoral ESG frameworks to understand how sustainability topics impact the Company’s business in terms of risks and opportunities. These sector-specific ESG standards provided detailed information on the financial impact of environmental and social issues on the business model. Complementary frameworks provided URW with a structured approach for assessing the likelihood, magnitude and nature of the effects of identified risks and opportunities, through the lens of the continuity of use or access to resources by URW as well as the Group’s dependence towards business relations. This phase involved evaluating the potential financial implications of each risk and opportunity for URW, considering their probability of occurrence, and understanding their potential impact on the Company’s operations, reputation, as well as its short, medium and long-term prospects. The financial implications were determined in the context of the Group’s risk mapping thresholds. This comprehensive assessment allowed URW to have a preliminary view of which topics were deemed more material for the Company.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed description of the decision-making process and the associated internal control procedures as part of the disclosure requirement IRO-1, which pertains to the identification and assessment of material impacts, risks, and opportunities.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_11
In 2023, URW carried out its double materiality assessment for the Group, across all business segments and activities. An external advisory firm supported the Group in this process to ensure the robustness and neutrality of the methodology. The results of the double materiality analysis were directly integrated in the Group’s risk management approach, as presented in section 6.2.2.C Category #3 environmental and social responsibility risks.
The purpose of this double materiality assessment was to assess the materiality of sustainability and ESG topics from 2 complementary perspectives:
An “impact” perspective, i.e., the negative or positive impacts of the Company and its activities on the environment, the people it works with and the communities it operates in. It considered the scale (level of criticality of the issue), the scope (value chain and affected stakeholders), the remediability (ability to mitigate the impact), as well as the likelihood of the impact.
A “financial” perspective, i.e., the risks or opportunities that environmental and social issues represent for the Company’s activity and value. It considered the Company’s dependencies towards business relations and stakeholders (i.e., financial partners, tenants or suppliers), as well as the continuity of use or access to resources that are essential for the Company to operate and grow (e.g., raw materials, retention of key talents or development of stricter regulations). The materiality of risks and opportunities has been assessed based on the likelihood of occurrence and the potential magnitude of the financial effects. The financial thresholds considered for the analysis were aligned with the financial impact scales used for the Group risk mapping.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 65%
- Provide a detailed account of the extent to which and how your process for identifying, assessing, and managing impacts and risks is integrated into your overall risk management process. Additionally, explain how this integration is utilized to evaluate your overall risk profile and risk management processes.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_12
In 2023, URW carried out its double materiality assessment for the Group, across all business segments and activities. An external advisory firm supported the Group in this process to ensure the robustness and neutrality of the methodology. The results of the double materiality analysis were directly integrated in the Group’s risk management approach, as presented in section 6.2.2.C Category #3 environmental and social responsibility risks.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 65%
- Provide a detailed account of the extent to which and how your process for identifying, assessing, and managing opportunities is integrated into your overall management process, as applicable.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_13
In 2023, URW carried out its double materiality assessment for the Group, across all business segments and activities. An external advisory firm supported the Group in this process to ensure the robustness and neutrality of the methodology. The results of the double materiality analysis were directly integrated in the Group’s risk management approach, as presented in section 6.2.2.C Category #3 environmental and social responsibility risks.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 80%
- Provide a detailed account of the input parameters utilized in the process to identify, assess, and manage material impacts, risks, and opportunities. Include information on data sources, the scope of operations covered, and the level of detail applied in assumptions.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_14
The materiality analysis was conducted in 4 phases:
- URW identified a list of sustainability topics by conducting a contextual analysis, a sectoral analysis and a selection of applicable international standards that are relevant to the commercial real estate sector and its closest related sectors, such as retail, offices and construction. Key topics of sectors that represent the value chain of URW were integrated in the analysis, including but not limited to, construction materials, engineering, building products and retail.
Report Date: 4Q2023Relevance: 60%