Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS S3 \ DR S3-2 \ Paragraph 21
Tags Tree
- "Provide a detailed account of whether and how the perspectives of affected communities are integrated into your company's decision-making processes or activities concerning the management of actual and potential impacts on these communities. Include, where applicable, an explanation of the methods and processes employed for such engagement."
-
Question Id: S3-2_01
We aim to go above the minimum regulatory requirements regarding engagement with affected communities, as we believe these engagements are essential for securing and sustaining the social license necessary for advancing renewable energy development. To ensure that our decisions reflect the perspectives of affected communities, we engage proactively with community stakeholders and local organisations and seek ongoing dialogue with them, ensuring their voices are heard and considered in our decision-making processes. This approach is being integrated across our business functions, markets, and asset projects. Engagement occurs at various frequencies and at various stages of a project. Our aim is to initiate early dialogue during the planning phase to gather the insights and concerns of the affected communities. This takes place through e.g. our community liaison officers and project staff employing different types of interaction, such as public meetings and consultations to facilitate open communication. When we employ community liaison officers in our projects, they often come from the communities we engage with, helping us gain a profound understanding of the local contexts. We continue this dialogue through the development, construction, and operation phases of our renewable energy assets.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 90%
- Has the undertaking disclosed whether all affected communities likely to be materially impacted by its operations, value chain, products, services, or business relationships are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2 SBM-3? Furthermore, in cases of material negative impacts, has the undertaking specified whether these impacts are widespread or systemic in the contexts where it operates or maintains business relationships, or if they are related to individual incidents within its own operations or specific business relationships? This should encompass impacts arising from the transition to greener and climate-neutral operations, including those associated with innovation, restructuring, mine closures, increased mineral mining for sustainable economy transitions, and solar panel production.
-
Question Id: S3.SBM-3_04
In general, our material impacts are widespread and systemic, particularly in regions where we develop renewable energy projects, or where critical materials are sourced for the technologies we use. They arise as part of the transition to greener and renewable operations. This transition includes challenges associated with innovation and restructuring, such as the increased demand for minerals and metals that are essential for renewable technologies.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%