Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS S3 \ DR S3-1 \ Paragraph AR 9
Tags Tree
- Can you provide a detailed explanation of any significant changes made to the policies adopted during the reporting year, specifically in relation to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities? Include a description of the process for setting these targets, and specify whether and how your organization engaged directly with affected communities, their legitimate representatives, or credible proxies with insight into their situation. Ensure that the description includes key information necessary for a faithful representation of the policies related to affected communities, particularly highlighting any new or additional approaches to engagement, due diligence, and remedy.
-
Question Id: S3-1_08
In 2024, we laid the foundation for many of the initiatives currently in progress for managing our negative impact and risks associated with failing to respect Indigenous Peoples’ rights and ensuring FPIC in our own operations. We began by developing a global guidance for social and human rights impact assessments, which will allow us to proactively manage these risks and impacts before the construction of new projects.
Furthermore, we finalised our internal guidelines for free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), a framework designed to ensure respectful and transparent engagement with Indigenous communities. These guidelines guarantee that we secure consent from Indigenous communities before initiating projects that might impact their lands or cultural heritage.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%
- Provide a detailed account of the processes implemented to track and monitor issues raised and addressed, as well as the measures taken to ensure the effectiveness of the channels available for affected communities to raise concerns. Include information on stakeholder involvement, particularly those who are the intended users of these channels.
-
Question Id: S3-3_13
We work closely with materially affected communities to monitor issues raised and addressed while also assessing the effectiveness of these grievance channels. We currently assess the effectiveness of our mechanisms and communication channels through our ongoing dialogue with local stakeholders. We want to further improve our processes of assessing the effectiveness of these efforts and are working to establish a global methodology for aggregating community feedback and grievance management. This will allow us to systematically track and monitor the effectiveness of our efforts. Specifically, we aim to implement a standardized process for receiving, addressing, resolving, and providing remedies to affected communities when necessary. We also plan to pilot a grievance reporting channel for a select supplier to collect workers’ grievances via a digital solution by 2025.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%