Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS S2 \ DR S2-1 \ Paragraph 19
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of whether and how your company's policies concerning value chain workers align with internationally recognized instruments pertinent to value chain workers, such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Additionally, disclose the extent to which any instances of non-compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises have been reported within your upstream and downstream value chain. If applicable, include an indication of the nature of such cases.
-
Question Id: S2-1_08
We align our policies with relevant internationally recognised guidelines and standards. Our 'Global human rights policy' aligns with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the International Bill of Human Rights, and the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Our 'Just transition policy' is aligned with the UN Global Compact (UNGC) and the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Our code of conduct for business partners adheres to several standards and conventions, including the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, the Maritime Labour Convention, IFC Performance Standards and the previously mentioned guidelines. We are currently not able to fully assess our full value chain for instances of non-respect for these principles, besides the indications from our external risk ratings and controversy reports, which have not identified any material incidents.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of whether and how your company's policies concerning value chain workers align with internationally recognized standards, specifically the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Additionally, disclose the extent to which any instances of non-compliance with these principles, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises have been identified within your upstream and downstream value chain. If applicable, include an indication of the nature of such cases.
-
Question Id: S2-1_09
We align our policies with relevant internationally recognised guidelines and standards. Our 'Global human rights policy' aligns with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the International Bill of Human Rights, and the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Our 'Just transition policy' is aligned with the UN Global Compact (UNGC) and the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Our code of conduct for business partners adheres to several standards and conventions, including the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, the Maritime Labour Convention, IFC Performance Standards and the previously mentioned guidelines. We are currently not able to fully assess our full value chain for instances of non-respect for these principles, besides the indications from our external risk ratings and controversy reports, which have not identified any material incidents.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Does the undertaking disclose whether all value chain workers who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including those affected through its operations, products, services, and business relationships, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2? Furthermore, in cases of material negative impacts, does the undertaking specify whether these impacts are (i) widespread or systemic in the contexts where it operates or maintains business relationships, such as child or forced labor in specific supply chains, or (ii) related to individual incidents or specific business relationships, such as industrial accidents or oil spills? Additionally, does the undertaking consider impacts on value chain workers that may arise from the transition to greener and climate-neutral operations, including those associated with innovation, restructuring, mine closures, increased mineral mining for sustainable economy transitions, and solar panel production?
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_05
Our material negative impacts on our suppliers’ and sub-contractors’ workers primarily relate to work-related rights violations, including excessive working hours, as well as concerns over safety for all workers engaged in our supply chain. There have also been known issues related to debt bondage, and state-imposed forced labour may occur in the solar PV supply chain. We are aware of a material risk related to forced labour allegations of inadequate labour protections and oversight in our supply chain for critical components. These include minerals and metals, such as rare earth elements for wind turbine magnets, copper for export or array cables, lithium for batteries, and silica for solar panels. These materials are often sourced from countries and areas in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, where enforcement of labour protections is weaker, increasing the risk of forced and child labour.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%