Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS S2 \ DR S2-1 \ Paragraph 17 c
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed description of your organization's human rights policy commitments concerning value chain workers. Include an explanation of the processes and mechanisms in place to ensure compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Focus specifically on the material aspects and the general approach to implementing measures that provide and/or enable remedies for human rights impacts.
-
Question Id: S2-1_04
Our approach to managing our negative impacts on value chain workers and our processes for identifying what is needed and appropriate to respond to these impacts emphasise responsible sourcing, the promotion of labour rights, and address environmental and social impacts and risks. To achieve this, we conduct regular assessments, risk-based audits, and stakeholder engagements, enabling us to monitor and ensure compliance across the supply chain. Our approach to addressing concerns and grievances within our value chain is built on the principles of transparency, trust, and effective remediation that is proportionate to the grievance that has occurred. We continuously work to strengthen our processes for providing or contributing to appropriate remediation to value chain workers who have been harmed, where we have identified that we have caused or contributed to a negative impact.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Does the undertaking disclose whether all value chain workers who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including those affected through its operations, products, services, and business relationships, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2? Furthermore, in cases of material negative impacts, does the undertaking specify whether these impacts are (i) widespread or systemic in the contexts where it operates or maintains business relationships, such as child or forced labor in specific supply chains, or (ii) related to individual incidents or specific business relationships, such as industrial accidents or oil spills? Additionally, does the undertaking consider impacts on value chain workers that may arise from the transition to greener and climate-neutral operations, including those associated with innovation, restructuring, mine closures, increased mineral mining for sustainable economy transitions, and solar panel production?
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_05
Our material negative impacts on our suppliers’ and sub-contractors’ workers primarily relate to work-related rights violations, including excessive working hours, as well as concerns over safety for all workers engaged in our supply chain. There have also been known issues related to debt bondage, and state-imposed forced labour may occur in the solar PV supply chain. We are aware of a material risk related to forced labour allegations of inadequate labour protections and oversight in our supply chain for critical components. These include minerals and metals, such as rare earth elements for wind turbine magnets, copper for export or array cables, lithium for batteries, and silica for solar panels. These materials are often sourced from countries and areas in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, where enforcement of labour protections is weaker, increasing the risk of forced and child labour.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%