Does the undertaking disclose the process for setting targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities, specifically addressing whether and how it engages directly with workers in the value chain, their legitimate representatives, or credible proxies with insight into their situation? Additionally, in relation to the protection of individuals using these mechanisms against retaliation, does the undertaking describe whether grievances are treated confidentially and with respect to the rights of privacy and data protection, and whether the mechanisms allow for anonymous submissions, such as through third-party representation?

Question

Accepted Answer

Currently, we have not set time-bound and outcome-oriented targets that meet the criteria for effectively reducing negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, or managing material risks and opportunities related to value chain workers. However, we recognise the importance of establishing robust targets to drive meaningful progress in these areas.
We are working to establish a clear process that will involve engaging directly with value chain workers, their representatives, or credible proxies. In the meantime, we are focused on gathering data and assessing current practices to ensure that future targets are effective and aligned with stakeholder needs. We are not yet fully able to monitor how effectively our policies and actions address our material sustainability-related impacts and risks for workers in the value chain.

Orsted

ESRS disclosure: S2-3_11

Tags Tree