Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS S1 \ DR S1-2
Tags Tree
- Does the undertaking disclose whether and how the perspectives of its own workforce inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing actual and potential impacts on its workforce? Include, where relevant, an explanation of the processes for engaging with the workforce and workers' representatives about these impacts.
-
Question Id: S1-2_01
At Ørsted, we believe in the importance of gaining direct insights and perspectives from our own workforce on a wide variety of matters. We see these insights as key aspects when outlining decisions and strategies. Our annual global People Matter survey aims at retrieving employees’ perspectives and opinions on satisfaction and motivation across almost 70 questions. The themes assessed within this anonymous survey include the degree of trust, openness, and transparency felt by our employees with regards to collaboration and the management bodies and the level of satisfaction within several aspects of the employees’ work life and conditions, e.g., job content, physical working conditions, compensation and employment terms, development opportunities, workload, stress, inclusion and diversity, and potential harassment at the workplace. The results are shared with the Group Executive Team for their strategic planning of priorities, activities, and follow-up actions. People leaders use the results within their respective teams to enable dialogues about potential improvement initiatives, ensuring a safe and inclusive working environment where everyone can thrive, perform, and grow.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Does the undertaking engage directly with its own workforce or their representatives to inform decisions or activities related to managing actual and potential impacts on its workforce? Provide details on the processes used for such engagement, including any relevant explanations.
-
Question Id: S1-2_02
Additionally, we have established an easily accessible site on our company intranet that outlines various options for employee representation on both global and local levels. These include various channels for employees to voice their opinions and engage both with other colleagues and with management. Such options include HR business partners, occupational health and safety representatives, different local works councils, cooperation committees, employment relations representatives, and personal development dialogues. Engagement and employee representation through more formal bodies, such as work councils and employment relations representatives, are generally regulated by local legislation or locally agreed with the respective employee representation body. The frequency of engagement is both regularly recurring meetings and extraordinary ones, summoned to discuss important topics related to the workforce.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the processes your organization employs to engage with its own workforce and workers' representatives concerning the impacts on them. Specify whether and how the perspectives of your workforce influence decisions or activities related to managing actual and potential impacts. Include an explanation of the stages at which engagement occurs, the type of engagement, and the frequency of such engagement.
-
Question Id: S1-2_03
Our annual global People Matter survey aims at retrieving employees’ perspectives and opinions on satisfaction and motivation across almost 70 questions. The themes assessed within this anonymous survey include the degree of trust, openness, and transparency felt by our employees with regards to collaboration and the management bodies and the level of satisfaction within several aspects of the employees’ work life and conditions, e.g., job content, physical working conditions, compensation and employment terms, development opportunities, workload, stress, inclusion and diversity, and potential harassment at the workplace. The results are shared with the Group Executive Team for their strategic planning of priorities, activities, and follow-up actions. People leaders use the results within their respective teams to enable dialogues about potential improvement initiatives, ensuring a safe and inclusive working environment where everyone can thrive, perform, and grow. Additionally, we have established an easily accessible site on our company intranet that outlines various options for employee representation on both global and local levels. These include various channels for employees to voice their opinions and engage both with other colleagues and with management. Such options include HR business partners, occupational health and safety representatives, different local works councils, cooperation committees, employment relations representatives, and personal development dialogues. Engagement and employee representation through more formal bodies, such as work councils and employment relations representatives, are generally regulated by local legislation or locally agreed with the respective employee representation body. The frequency of engagement is both regularly recurring meetings and extraordinary ones, summoned to discuss important topics related to the workforce.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Identify the function and the most senior role within your organization that holds operational responsibility for ensuring engagement with your workforce and workers' representatives occurs, and that the outcomes of such engagement inform your organization's approach. Provide details on whether and how the perspectives of your workforce influence decisions or activities related to managing actual and potential impacts on them.
-
Question Id: S1-2_04
The overall accountability for the People Matter survey, Ørsted IN networks, and HR business partners’ engagement rests with the Chief HR Officer. In regard to engagement via our formal representation bodies, such as works councils, it depends on the specific country in scope with whom the operational responsibility rests. However, in general, this responsibility rests with our Chief HR Officer together with the country manager of the respective country. For other representative bodies, such as occupational health and safety representatives, the operational responsibility rests with our Head of QHSE.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of whether and how your organization incorporates the perspectives of its workforce in decision-making processes concerning the management of actual and potential impacts on your workforce. Include, if applicable, a description of any Global Framework Agreement or other agreements with workers' representatives that pertain to the respect of human rights within your workforce. Additionally, explain how such agreements facilitate your organization in understanding the perspectives of your workforce.
-
Question Id: S1-2_05
At Ørsted, we believe in the importance of gaining direct insights and perspectives from our own workforce on a wide variety of matters. We see these insights as key aspects when outlining decisions and strategies. Our annual global People Matter survey aims at retrieving employees’ perspectives and opinions on satisfaction and motivation across almost 70 questions. The themes assessed within this anonymous survey include the degree of trust, openness, and transparency felt by our employees with regards to collaboration and the management bodies and the level of satisfaction within several aspects of the employees’ work life and conditions, e.g., job content, physical working conditions, compensation and employment terms, development opportunities, workload, stress, inclusion and diversity, and potential harassment at the workplace. The results are shared with the Group Executive Team for their strategic planning of priorities, activities, and follow-up actions. People leaders use the results within their respective teams to enable dialogues about potential improvement initiatives, ensuring a safe and inclusive working environment where everyone can thrive, perform, and grow.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%
- Provide a detailed account of whether and how your organization incorporates the perspectives of its own workforce in decision-making processes or activities that address actual and potential impacts on the workforce. Include, where applicable, an explanation of the methods used to assess the effectiveness of engagement with your workforce, along with any relevant agreements or outcomes that have been achieved.
-
Question Id: S1-2_06
Most importantly, the People Matter survey is an effective tool with a high participation ratio (91 % for 2024), supported by follow-up activities (incl. sessions with HR business partners and HR colleagues locally), aimed at actively following up on matters which were evaluated particularly low. Other ways of testing effectiveness of different engagement initiatives include using pulse surveys, which are directly aimed at assessing the efficiency of the different initiatives set in place to establish dialogues with our employees.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the measures implemented to understand the viewpoints of individuals within your workforce who are potentially vulnerable to impacts or marginalized, such as women, migrants, and individuals with disabilities.
-
Question Id: S1-2_07
To gain deeper insights into the perspectives of employees who may be particularly vulnerable or marginalised, we are taking two significant steps. First, we are working to collect more comprehensive data across various identity dimensions. In the US, this has allowed us to better understand the experiences of specific racial and ethnic communities, gender, disability, and caregiving status, with the goal of expanding this data collection capacity globally. Secondly, we are re-designing our employee engagement survey tools to ensure that these tools are equipped to capture insights on equity, diversity, and inclusion. This enables us to build a more inclusive workplace by incorporating the voices and experiences of all employees into our decision-making processes.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Has the undertaking failed to adopt a general process for engaging with its own workforce and workers' representatives regarding impacts? If so, disclose this fact and provide a timeframe for when such a process will be implemented.
-
Question Id: S1-2_08
At Ørsted, we believe in the importance of gaining direct insights and perspectives from our own workforce on a wide variety of matters. We see these insights as key aspects when outlining decisions and strategies.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Has the undertaking adopted a general process for engaging with its own workforce and workers' representatives regarding impacts? If not, disclose this fact and provide the timeframe within which the undertaking intends to establish such a process.
-
Question Id: S1-2_09
At Ørsted, we believe in the importance of gaining direct insights and perspectives from our own workforce on a wide variety of matters. We see these insights as key aspects when outlining decisions and strategies.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Provide detailed information on how your organization engages with individuals in at-risk or vulnerable situations, including any specific approaches or special attention given to potential barriers, as outlined in Disclosure Requirement S1-2 regarding processes for engaging with your workforce and workers' representatives about impacts. Additionally, report on any identified cases of severe human rights incidents, such as forced labor, human trafficking, or child labor, as specified in Disclosure Requirement S1-17.
-
Question Id: S1-2_10
Our Audit & Risk Committee receives quarterly overviews of all inappropriate and illegal misconduct cases across jurisdictions that have either been managed or are in process locally. This reporting includes incidents of discrimination, including harassment, which in 2024 totaled 5 substantiated cases. A dedicated team in People & Culture is responsible for sending Internal Audit an anonymous global overview. A dedicated system is used to confidentially report on these cases, ensuring country-by-country access protection and only to authorised employees. For GDPR compliance, all data on employee cases are anonymous. In 2024, we had zero severe human rights incidents connected to our employees.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%