We defined five process steps for conducting the DMA. In addition, there was a fundamental initial step of 'understanding the context' as suggested in the ESRS IG1. Our work with mapping our sustainability-related impacts builds on the approach we have used for over a decade for assessing the materiality of sustainability-related matters. Furthermore, our daily work with sustainability is supported by benchmark reports, studies, and internal projects, including regulatory landscape understanding, media monitoring, peer analysis, etc. The process includes: 1. Engagement of stakeholders: We identified subject-matter experts with extensive insight and deep knowledge into each ESRS standard and set-up DMA workshops with them. These experts included a variety of employees working with sustainability impacts and risks at corporate level and in the business as well as employees working with regulatory and public affairs. Onboarding sessions helped to get a common understanding of the new CSRD regulation and objectives of the DMA. 2. Scoping of IROs: As preparation for the workshops, we identified IROs relating to environmental, social, and governance matters. We consulted relevant internal information (e.g. previous materiality assessments, internal impact reports, internal risk memos, and stakeholder findings) to scope and pre-define relevant matters per ESRS sub-topic and sub-sub-topic. This gross list of IROs formed the starting point for verification and assessment at the workshops. 3. Assessment of IROs: At the workshops, the experts reviewed the predefined IROs and adjusted naming and classification of these, where relevant. Secondly, they assessed each IRO, and scoring rationales were documented, including relevant reference documents. Lastly, participants added additional IROs if they found that a relevant matter was not captured in the pre-defined list. The experts were introduced to the assessment criteria at the workshops to ensure a consistent approach and understanding of the scoring methodology. Where relevant, additional experts were identified and consulted following the initial workshops to capture insights for a specific matter or regional perspectives. 4. Validation of results and calibration: Results from the workshops were systematically captured and aggregated using a scoring tool in order to calculate the degree of materiality of each IRO. The tool was organised to clearly link the ESRS topics, sub-topics, and sub-sub-topics to each IRO identified and assessed in the workshops. The tool provided an overview of the scores which constituted the preliminary results. Workshop participants were consulted again for validation of the preliminary results. If any adjustments were needed, the relevant expert provided the rationale for adjustment in order to document any changes. As a next validation step, a calibration group calibrated the preliminary results before the final review and approval step. This group consisted of the head of Group Finance, the head of Global Sustainability, and leads from Investor Relations and Global Regulatory & Public Affairs. The group specifically focused on bringing their insights from external stakeholders, including investors, to bridge the results to our strategic sustainability priorities. 5. Final review and approval: In the final step, the results were reviewed and approved by relevant leaders. Any necessary adjustments were incorporated before their final sign-off. After their approval, the DMA process and results were presented to the Group Executive Team. Finally, the results were approved by the Board of Directors.