Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E4 \ DR E4-1 \ Paragraph AR 1 d
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of how your organization contributes to addressing biodiversity and ecosystem impact drivers. Include potential mitigation actions aligned with the mitigation hierarchy, and specify any main path-dependencies and locked-in assets and resources, such as plants or raw materials, that are associated with changes in biodiversity and ecosystems. This information should be part of your transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems within your strategy and business model, as required under Disclosure Requirement E4-6 regarding anticipated financial effects from material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities.
-
Question Id: E4-1_11
Our business model is to develop, construct, operate, and own renewable assets, and we are committed to doing this in an environmentally and socially sustainable way. However, we recognise that expanding our operations also implies a greater pressure on natural ecosystems. Therefore, protecting and restoring these ecosystems must be part of the solution, and we remain fully committed to effectively manage our impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems. Biodiversity management is an integral part of our business model and decision-making processes throughout the full life cycle of our projects. This ranges from early-stage site selection and planning, over project design, construction, operations, and eventually to decommissioning.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 65%
- Provide a comprehensive list of material sites within your operations, including those under your operational control, as determined by paragraph 17(a). Specify the biodiversity-sensitive areas impacted by these sites, enabling users to ascertain the location and identify the responsible competent authority concerning the activities outlined in paragraph 16(a) i.
-
Question Id: E4.SBM-3_04
In addition to the operational sites, we had 12 assets under construction in 2024, which were identified as material sites that temporarily have activities negatively affecting biodiversity-sensitive areas. These sites are listed in the table on page 114 and include nine offshore wind and three solar PV projects. At the offshore construction sites, biodiversity impacts were primarily associated with monopile piling, which generates noise pollution, and cable laying, which disrupts benthic and intertidal habitats. Additionally, the increased vessel traffic during construction caused further disruption to the ecosystem through noise pollution. For the solar PV assets under construction, biodiversity impacts were primarily due to land clearing and cable laying, which caused temporary habitat disruption and species displacement. Additionally, the operation of machinery contributed to noise pollution. All these impacts are appropriately managed or mitigated through implementation of measures agreed through impact assessment and permitting processes.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%