Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E4 \ DR E4-1 \ Paragraph AR 1 d
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of how your organization contributes to addressing biodiversity and ecosystem impact drivers. Include potential mitigation actions aligned with the mitigation hierarchy, and specify any main path-dependencies and locked-in assets and resources, such as plants or raw materials, that are associated with changes in biodiversity and ecosystems. This information should be part of your transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems within your strategy and business model, as required under Disclosure Requirement E4-6 regarding anticipated financial effects from material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities.
-
Question Id: E4-1_11
Our business model is to develop, construct, operate, and own renewable assets, and we are committed to doing this in an environmentally and socially sustainable way. However, we recognise that expanding our operations also implies a greater pressure on natural ecosystems. Therefore, protecting and restoring these ecosystems must be part of the solution, and we remain fully committed to effectively manage our impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems. Biodiversity management is an integral part of our business model and decision-making processes throughout the full life cycle of our projects. This ranges from early-stage site selection and planning, over project design, construction, operations, and eventually to decommissioning.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 65%
- Provide a comprehensive list of material sites within your own operations, detailing their significance in relation to material impacts, risks, and opportunities, and how these elements interact with your strategy and business model.
-
Question Id: E4.SBM-3_01
We have completed an assessment of all our operational assets in collaboration with The Biodiversity Consultancy, using their Biodiversity Risk Screening Kit (BRISK). This assessment focused on biodiversity- and ecosystem-related impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities at an asset level, helping us to better understand which sites are material in this respect. It takes a variety of factors into account that indicate impacts on biodiversity on a scale ranging from low over medium to high. These factors include species, designated areas (including protected areas and key biodiversity areas (KBAs)), ecoregion intactness, water pollution, and marine habitats, amongst others. The assessment highlights a list of matters, indicating that there are potential negative impacts on biodiversity if nothing is done to avoid or mitigate these. From that output, we have found that the majority of the identified risks have already been identified through our EIA or equivalent processes as well as mitigated as a part of our biodiversity action plans. Therefore, we are taking all necessary steps to limit risks and negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems at all our site locations. When we identify overlaps with e.g. an IUCN Red-listed species, an action plan is developed to ensure that we do no significant harm to this species, nor any threatened species, both during construction and the operational phase.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%