Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E4 \ DR E4-1 \ Paragraph 13 e
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of the outcomes derived from the resilience analysis concerning biodiversity and ecosystems.
-
Question Id: E4-1_05
We have not identified any material dependencies on biodiversity and ecosystems, although soil stability at our sites constitutes the most significant dependency. Regarding our transitional and physical risks, we have mapped out our exposure and have not found significant risks from biodiversity and ecosystems that are not already covered in our mitigation processes and biodiversity action plans. Additionally, we have not identified any systemic risks to our business model that are not addressed through our established practices or the implementation of measures to reach our biodiversity ambition.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed description of whether and how local and indigenous knowledge, as well as nature-based solutions, have been integrated into your biodiversity and ecosystems-related actions.
-
Question Id: E4-3_09
For several of our biodiversity pilot projects, we engage with local communities in our biodiversity- and ecosystems-related actions. This was for example the case with our Humber Estuary restoration project in the UK, which we completed in collaboration with the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust and Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust. The restoration of the Humber Estuary is an example of coastal ecosystem restoration, a nature-based solution that contributes to the sequestration of carbon, while also restoring the natural habitat to improve biodiversity. We have not yet incorporated indigenous knowledge into our actions; however, this is integrated in our new ‘Biodiversity measurement framework’ and will be done going forward.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%