Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E4 \ DR E4-1 \ Paragraph 13 a
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed description of the resilience of your current business model and strategy concerning biodiversity and ecosystems. Include an assessment of how your business model and strategy withstand biodiversity and ecosystems-related physical, transition, and systemic risks.
-
Question Id: E4-1_01
We have not identified any material dependencies on biodiversity and ecosystems, although soil stability at our sites constitutes the most significant dependency. Regarding our transitional and physical risks, we have mapped out our exposure and have not found significant risks from biodiversity and ecosystems that are not already covered in our mitigation processes and biodiversity action plans. Additionally, we have not identified any systemic risks to our business model that are not addressed through our established practices or the implementation of measures to reach our biodiversity ambition.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of how the mitigation hierarchy has been implemented concerning your company's actions related to biodiversity and ecosystems, specifically addressing avoidance, minimisation, restoration/rehabilitation, and compensation or offsets.
-
Question Id: E4-3_01
To understand and manage our impacts, we follow the mitigation hierarchy. This means we aim to avoid harmful action at the outset of an activity, minimise impacts, and take restorative measures where impacts cannot be avoided. We also compensate for any residual adverse impacts that cannot be restored – while recognising that certain environmental features are irreplaceable and therefore cannot be compensated.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%