Our approach to resilience analysis consists of two main components: assessing and managing transition risks and opportunities, and conducting physical climate risk assessments. Transition risks stem from a shift to a low-carbon economy and encompass factors such as new regulations, technological innovation, changing market dynamics, and shifting consumer preferences. We have effectively mitigated these risks by transforming our business model from fossil fuels to renewable energy, aligning our operations with a 1.5 °C climate trajectory. This proactive shift has positioned us well to capitalise on the increasing demand for renewable energy deployment.

For the purposes of meeting financial materiality assessment requirements, we have also considered the following time horizons: short term (covering the current reporting year and the next year), medium term (from the end of the short-term period to five years), and long term (more than five years). Applying these horizons did not lead to any changes in the results of the assessment. It is important to note that, in the context of climate change, these time horizons are relatively short term and may not fully reflect the scale of risks that develop over extended periods.

Our physical climate risk assessment analyses data based on the remaining operational lifetimes of our assets, which extend up to 35 years. This period is considered medium term in climate projections, as significant climate changes are not typically observed in the short term. The long-term horizon, defined as 2060 onwards, is not applicable under our current methodology, as all existing assets are scheduled for decommissioning before that time.