Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 b
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of the decarbonisation levers identified and the key actions planned within your transition plan for climate change mitigation. This should include references to your GHG emission reduction targets and climate change mitigation actions, as specified in Disclosure Requirements E1-4 and E1-3. Additionally, elucidate any changes anticipated in your product and service portfolio, as well as the adoption of new technologies within your operations or across the upstream and/or downstream value chain.
-
Question Id: E1-1_03
Ørsted's transition plan includes key decarbonisation levers and identifies strategic actions that have driven the transformation of the business model towards renewable energy. The plan supports broader policy priorities, including the European Union’s 2050 climate neutrality goals. Ørsted targets reductions in scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions. In 2024, they closed Esbjerg Power Station, their last coal-fired CHP plant, advancing decarbonisation efforts. They aim for a 93% reduction in scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions intensity by 2025 and progress towards a 96% reduction by 2030. The interim scope 1-3 GHG emissions intensity target outlines a reduction trajectory of ~77% by 2030. Ørsted is also focusing on renewable energy capacity growth and the phase-out of coal, with a target to meet their 2025 target of a 99% share of energy generation coming from renewables.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed explanation of the time horizons applied in your resilience analysis, ensuring alignment with the climate and business scenarios used to determine material physical and transition risks, as well as in setting GHG emissions reduction targets. This disclosure should correspond to the requirements outlined in paragraphs AR 11 to AR 12 and should be consistent with the information reported under Disclosure Requirement E1-4.
-
Question Id: E1.SBM-3_05
For the purposes of meeting financial materiality assessment requirements, we have also considered the following time horizons: short term (covering the current reporting year and the next year), medium term (from the end of the short-term period to five years), and long term (more than five years). Applying these horizons did not lead to any changes in the results of the assessment. It is important to note that, in the context of climate change, these time horizons are relatively short term and may not fully reflect the scale of risks that develop over extended periods.
Our physical climate risk assessment analyses data based on the remaining operational lifetimes of our assets, which extend up to 35 years. This period is considered medium term in climate projections, as significant climate changes are not typically observed in the short term. The long-term horizon, defined as 2060 onwards, is not applicable under our current methodology, as all existing assets are scheduled for decommissioning before that time.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%