Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 a
Tags Tree
- ESRS ESRS 2ESRS 2 Framework
- ESRS E1Climate Remuneration Disclosure
- ESRS E2Pollution Management
- ESRS E3Water & Marine Resources
- ESRS E4Material Sites Disclosure
- ESRS E5Resource Use & Circular Economy
- ESRS S1Workforce Impact Disclosure
- ESRS S2Value Chain Workers Scope
- ESRS S3Affected Communities Disclosure
- ESRS S4Consumer Impact Disclosure
- ESRS G1Governance Disclosure
- Provide an explanation of how your company's greenhouse gas emission reduction targets align with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C, as stipulated by the Paris Agreement, in accordance with Disclosure Requirement E1-1 regarding the transition plan for climate change mitigation.
-
Question Id: E1-1_02
Ørsted's transition plan outlines the company's overall pathway to achieving net-zero emissions by 2040, aligned with the 1.5 °C goal of the Paris Agreement. The plan is substantiated by science-based targets, includes key decarbonisation levers, and identifies strategic actions that have driven the transformation of our business model towards renewable energy and will continue to shape our ongoing transition.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the resilience analysis conducted on your strategy and business model concerning climate change. Include specifics on the timing and methodology of the analysis, particularly the application of climate scenario analysis as outlined in the Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 and its associated application requirement paragraphs.
-
Question Id: E1.SBM-3_03
Transition risks, including macroeconomic, business, and geopolitical risks, are managed through our 'Enterprise risk management (ERM) framework', supported by dedicated teams. This framework provides a high-level, principle-based structure for addressing all risks to which Ørsted may be exposed. The ERM framework sets the standards for individual risk frameworks across the organisation, ensuring that risks are identified and managed in line with the appetite for risk.
Complementing the ERM framework is the double materiality assessment (DMA), which serves as both an assessment methodology and a focused lens for driving sustainability-related matters. Risks are assessed on an ongoing basis as part of our day-to-day business. The derived insights, including the DMA outcomes, are synthesised to provide a comprehensive view of sustainability-related risks and opportunities, ensuring alignment with our strategy and business model.
We assess physical risks from two perspectives: design safeguards and business case impacts. The design safeguard evaluation ensures the structural integrity and resilience of assets against climate hazards using region-specific data. Our analysis focuses on offshore, onshore, and bioenergy assets that have reached final investment decision, representing critical components of our portfolio.
The business case impact assessment is conducted at a high-resolution, asset-by-asset level under the SSP5-8.5 worst-case scenario. This conservative approach ensures resilience measures address severe climate risks and protect long-term operational and financial stability. The scope includes offshore and onshore assets currently generating across our operating markets, representing the majority of our climate risk exposure.
Our physical climate risk assessment analyses data based on the remaining operational lifetimes of our assets, which extend up to 35 years. This period is considered medium term in climate projections, as significant climate changes are not typically observed in the short term. The long-term horizon, defined as 2060 onwards, is not applicable under our current methodology, as all existing assets are scheduled for decommissioning before that time.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%