Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 d
Tags Tree
- Provide a qualitative assessment of the potential locked-in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from your company's key assets and products. Explain whether and how these emissions could jeopardize the achievement of your GHG emission reduction targets and contribute to transition risk. Additionally, if applicable, describe your company's plans to manage its GHG-intensive and energy-intensive assets and products.
-
Question Id: E1-1_07
We recognise the importance of tackling the impacts of our legacy business, as locked-in emissions pose a significant transition challenge if left unaddressed. To guide progress toward our net-zero goals, we have set an absolute emissions reduction target for scope 3 emissions from gas sales, aiming to reduce emissions by ~67% by 2030 (baseline 2018) and by ~90% by 2040. To mitigate potential risks associated with locked-in emissions, we focus on measurable performance and avoiding additional locked-in emissions by not entering into new gas sourcing agreements that would contribute to additional locked-in emissions.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the processes your organization employs to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks, and opportunities. Specifically, elucidate the methods used to address climate-related physical risks within your own operations and throughout the upstream and downstream segments of your value chain.
-
Question Id: E1.IRO-1_02
Physical climate risks are managed through our 'Enterprise risk management (ERM) framework', supported by dedicated teams. This framework provides a high-level, principle-based structure for addressing all risks to which Ørsted may be exposed. The ERM framework sets the standards for individual risk frameworks across the organisation, ensuring that risks are identified and managed in line with the appetite for risk.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%