Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 d
Tags Tree
- Provide a qualitative assessment of the potential locked-in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from your company's key assets and products. Explain whether and how these emissions could jeopardize the achievement of your GHG emission reduction targets and contribute to transition risk. Additionally, if applicable, describe your company's plans to manage its GHG-intensive and energy-intensive assets and products.
-
Question Id: E1-1_07
We recognise the importance of tackling the impacts of our legacy business, as locked-in emissions pose a significant transition challenge if left unaddressed. To guide progress toward our net-zero goals, we have set an absolute emissions reduction target for scope 3 emissions from gas sales, aiming to reduce emissions by ~67% by 2030 (baseline 2018) and by ~90% by 2040. To mitigate potential risks associated with locked-in emissions, we focus on measurable performance and avoiding additional locked-in emissions by not entering into new gas sourcing agreements that would contribute to additional locked-in emissions.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed explanation of how climate-related considerations are integrated into the remuneration structures for members of the administrative, management, and supervisory bodies. Specify whether their performance evaluations include assessments against the GHG emission reduction targets as outlined in Disclosure Requirement E1-4. Additionally, indicate the percentage of current period remuneration linked to these climate-related considerations and describe the specific climate considerations involved.
-
Question Id: E1.GOV-3_03
Incorporating climate-related considerations into the executive remuneration framework ensures that incentives are aligned with both financial performance and climate objectives. A portion of executive remuneration is linked to climate-specific considerations, including scope 1-2 emissions intensity target. The proportion of recognised remuneration linked to these climate-specific considerations was 1.9% for the CEO, with corresponding figures for the Executive Board as follows: 1.6% for the CCO, 1.4% for the CFO, and 1.5% for the Chief HR Officer. Further details on the methodology, including how climate-related performance is factored into remuneration, can be found in our remuneration report.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%