Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 h
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed explanation of how the transition plan for climate change mitigation is integrated into and aligned with your company's overall business strategy and financial planning.
-
Question Id: E1-1_13
Our approach to resilience analysis consists of two main components: assessing and managing transition risks and opportunities, and conducting physical climate risk assessments. Transition risks stem from a shift to a low-carbon economy and encompass factors such as new regulations, technological innovation, changing market dynamics, and shifting consumer preferences. We have effectively mitigated these risks by transforming our business model from fossil fuels to renewable energy, aligning our operations with a 1.5 °C climate trajectory. This proactive shift has positioned us well to capitalise on the increasing demand for renewable energy deployment.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 65%
- Provide a detailed reconciliation of the net revenue figures used to calculate GHG intensity, ensuring alignment with the corresponding line items or notes in the financial statements, as stipulated by paragraph 55. This disclosure should reflect the anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks, as well as potential climate-related opportunities, unless such quantification fails to meet the qualitative characteristics of useful information as outlined in ESRS 1 Appendix B.
-
Question Id: E1-6_35
GHG intensity based on energy generation is calculated as the total scope 1, 2 (market-based), and scope 3 (excluding gas sales) emissions divided by total heat and power generation. The calculation of GHG intensity based on net revenue divides the total scope 1-3 GHG emissions (numerator) with the total net revenue as shown in the financial statements (denominator).
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 10%