Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 d
Tags Tree
- Provide a qualitative assessment of the potential locked-in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from your company's key assets and products. Explain whether and how these emissions could jeopardize the achievement of your GHG emission reduction targets and contribute to transition risk. Additionally, if applicable, describe your company's plans to manage its GHG-intensive and energy-intensive assets and products.
-
Question Id: E1-1_07
We recognise the importance of tackling the impacts of our legacy business, as locked-in emissions pose a significant transition challenge if left unaddressed. To guide progress toward our net-zero goals, we have set an absolute emissions reduction target for scope 3 emissions from gas sales, aiming to reduce emissions by ~67% by 2030 (baseline 2018) and by ~90% by 2040. To mitigate potential risks associated with locked-in emissions, we focus on measurable performance and avoiding additional locked-in emissions by not entering into new gas sourcing agreements that would contribute to additional locked-in emissions.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the reporting boundaries considered and the calculation methods employed for estimating Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Specify the calculation tools utilized, if any, for each significant Scope 3 GHG category, ensuring consistency with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP) guidelines.
-
Question Id: E1-6_29
Use of sold products (category 11) emissions from end-use of gas. Capital goods (category 2) wind farms, offshore. The model is based on the ISO 14040/44 life cycle assessment standard and applied in the openLCA software. The modeling is conducted using the Environmental Footprint 3.0 LCIA (life cycle impact assessment) method, and the impacts of each activity/material come from the ecoinvent environmental database, version 3.8.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%