Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 c
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of your organization's significant operational and capital expenditures necessary for the execution of your climate change mitigation transition plan, as outlined in Disclosure Requirement E1-1. This should include an explanation and quantification of investments and funding, referencing the key performance indicators of taxonomy-aligned capital expenditures, and, where applicable, the capital expenditure plans disclosed in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178.
-
Question Id: E1-1_04
In 2024, 99% of Ørsted’s capital expenditures (CAPEX) have been allocated to activities classified as sustainable. These expenditures include DKK 37,867 million for the deployment of offshore and onshore wind capacity, DKK 6,097 million for the deployment of solar PV and energy storage technologies, and DKK 2,836 million for hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, and bioenergy activities.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed explanation and quantification of your company's investments and funding allocated to the implementation of its transition plan for climate change mitigation. This should reference the climate change mitigation actions as required by Disclosure Requirement E1-3. Include key performance indicators of taxonomy-aligned CapEx and, where relevant, the CapEx plans disclosed in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178.
-
Question Id: E1-1_05
In 2024, 99% of Ørsted’s capital expenditures (CAPEX) have been allocated to activities classified as sustainable. These expenditures include DKK 37,867 million for the deployment of offshore and onshore wind capacity, DKK 6,097 million for the deployment of solar PV and energy storage technologies, and DKK 2,836 million for hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, and bioenergy activities.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 20%
- Provide a detailed explanation and quantification of your company's investments and funding allocated to support the implementation of its transition plan for climate change mitigation. This should reference the climate change mitigation actions as outlined in Disclosure Requirement E1-3. Include key performance indicators of taxonomy-aligned CapEx and, where applicable, the CapEx plans disclosed in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178.
-
Question Id: E1-1_06
In 2024, 99% of Ørsted’s capital expenditures (CAPEX) have been allocated to activities classified as sustainable. These expenditures include DKK 37,867 million for the deployment of offshore and onshore wind capacity, DKK 6,097 million for the deployment of solar PV and energy storage technologies, and DKK 2,836 million for hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, and bioenergy activities.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 10%
- Provide a detailed explanation of how significant capital expenditures (CapEx) and operational expenditures (OpEx), necessary for implementing actions taken or planned, relate to the key performance indicators as mandated by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178, in accordance with Disclosure Requirement E1-3 concerning actions and resources in relation to climate change policies.
-
Question Id: E1-3_07
Incorporating climate-related considerations into the executive remuneration framework ensures that incentives are aligned with both financial performance and climate objectives. As a renewable energy company, our financial metrics inherently reflect climate performance, reinforcing the link between executive pay and our decarbonisation efforts. A key financial metric linked to executive remuneration is EBITDA. The majority of EBITDA (91 %) is taxonomy-aligned, generated through activities that contribute to climate change mitigation under the EU taxonomy framework. This highlights the connection between executive remuneration and renewable energy growth, supporting our long-term decarbonisation ambition. Beyond financial performance, a portion of executive remuneration is linked to climate-specific considerations, including our scope 1-2 emissions intensity target. The proportion of recognised remuneration linked to these climate-specific considerations was 1.9% for the CEO, with corresponding figures for the Executive Board as follows: 1.6% for the CCO, 1.4% for the CFO, and 1.5% for the Chief HR Officer. Further details on the methodology, including how climate-related performance is factored into remuneration, can be found in our remuneration report.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 20%