Orsted
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 a
Tags Tree
- Provide an explanation of how your company's greenhouse gas emission reduction targets align with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C, as stipulated by the Paris Agreement, in accordance with Disclosure Requirement E1-1 regarding the transition plan for climate change mitigation.
-
Question Id: E1-1_02
Ørsted's transition plan outlines the company's overall pathway to achieving net-zero emissions by 2040, aligned with the 1.5 °C goal of the Paris Agreement. The plan is substantiated by science-based targets, includes key decarbonisation levers, and identifies strategic actions that have driven the transformation of our business model towards renewable energy and will continue to shape our ongoing transition.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed explanation of how significant capital expenditures (CapEx) and operational expenditures (OpEx), necessary for implementing actions taken or planned, relate to the key performance indicators as mandated by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178, in accordance with Disclosure Requirement E1-3 concerning actions and resources in relation to climate change policies.
-
Question Id: E1-3_07
Incorporating climate-related considerations into the executive remuneration framework ensures that incentives are aligned with both financial performance and climate objectives. As a renewable energy company, our financial metrics inherently reflect climate performance, reinforcing the link between executive pay and our decarbonisation efforts. A key financial metric linked to executive remuneration is EBITDA. The majority of EBITDA (91 %) is taxonomy-aligned, generated through activities that contribute to climate change mitigation under the EU taxonomy framework. This highlights the connection between executive remuneration and renewable energy growth, supporting our long-term decarbonisation ambition. Beyond financial performance, a portion of executive remuneration is linked to climate-specific considerations, including our scope 1-2 emissions intensity target. The proportion of recognised remuneration linked to these climate-specific considerations was 1.9% for the CEO, with corresponding figures for the Executive Board as follows: 1.6% for the CCO, 1.4% for the CFO, and 1.5% for the Chief HR Officer. Further details on the methodology, including how climate-related performance is factored into remuneration, can be found in our remuneration report.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 20%