Orsted
ESRS disclosure
Tags Tree
- Does the undertaking include all value chain workers who are likely to be materially impacted by its operations, products, services, and business relationships within the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2, as required by ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48? Additionally, provide the necessary information as stipulated in the regulation.
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_01
We have assessed IROs related to workers in our value chain, focusing primarily on our first-tier suppliers’ workers but also workers further out in our supply chain, by using industry knowledge and internal knowledge based on our engagement in various forums. Workers in our value chain who are likely to be materially impacted by our operations and business relationships are included in the scope of our disclosures.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of whether all value chain workers potentially subject to material impacts by your organization, including those affected through your operations, products, services, and business relationships, are encompassed within the scope of your disclosure under ESRS 2. Additionally, offer a concise description of the types of value chain workers who could be materially impacted, specifying their connection to your operations, value chain, products, services, and business relationships.
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_02
Our projects involve a diverse range of workers across the value chain, including those in upstream activities (such as refining, manufacturing, logistics, transportation, and mining and extraction of minerals and metals) and on-site construction, particularly in offshore operations. The latter includes workers at our project sites who are not part of our own workforce, such as subcontracted or temporary workers. These workers are materially impacted by our activities due to the nature of their work.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%
- Does the undertaking include all value chain workers who are likely to be materially impacted by its operations, products, services, or business relationships within the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2 SBM-3? Additionally, provide a brief description of the types of value chain workers who could be materially impacted and specify whether they are included in the disclosure.
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_03
Our projects involve a diverse range of workers across the value chain, including those in upstream activities (such as refining, manufacturing, logistics, transportation, and mining and extraction of minerals and metals) and on-site construction, particularly in offshore operations. The latter includes workers at our project sites who are not part of our own workforce, such as subcontracted or temporary workers. These workers are materially impacted by our activities due to the nature of their work.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Does the undertaking include all value chain workers who are likely to be materially impacted by its operations, products, services, or business relationships within the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2 SBM-3? Additionally, identify any geographies or commodities at the country or other levels where there is a significant risk of child labour, forced labour, or compulsory labour among workers in the undertaking's value chain.
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_04
We are aware of a material risk related to forced labour allegations of inadequate labour protections and oversight in our supply chain for critical components. These include minerals and metals, such as rare earth elements for wind turbine magnets, copper for export or array cables, lithium for batteries, and silica for solar panels. These materials are often sourced from countries and areas in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, where enforcement of labour protections is weaker, increasing the risk of forced and child labour.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 65%
- Does the undertaking disclose whether all value chain workers who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including those affected through its operations, products, services, and business relationships, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2? Furthermore, in cases of material negative impacts, does the undertaking specify whether these impacts are (i) widespread or systemic in the contexts where it operates or maintains business relationships, such as child or forced labor in specific supply chains, or (ii) related to individual incidents or specific business relationships, such as industrial accidents or oil spills? Additionally, does the undertaking consider impacts on value chain workers that may arise from the transition to greener and climate-neutral operations, including those associated with innovation, restructuring, mine closures, increased mineral mining for sustainable economy transitions, and solar panel production?
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_05
Our material negative impacts on our suppliers’ and sub-contractors’ workers primarily relate to work-related rights violations, including excessive working hours, as well as concerns over safety for all workers engaged in our supply chain. There have also been known issues related to debt bondage, and state-imposed forced labour may occur in the solar PV supply chain. We are aware of a material risk related to forced labour allegations of inadequate labour protections and oversight in our supply chain for critical components. These include minerals and metals, such as rare earth elements for wind turbine magnets, copper for export or array cables, lithium for batteries, and silica for solar panels. These materials are often sourced from countries and areas in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, where enforcement of labour protections is weaker, increasing the risk of forced and child labour.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%
- Does the undertaking include all value chain workers likely to be materially impacted by its operations, products, services, and business relationships within the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2 SBM-3? Additionally, provide a description of activities that result in material positive impacts, such as updated purchasing practices or capacity-building initiatives for supply chain workers. Specify the types of value chain workers that are positively affected or could be positively affected, and indicate if these positive impacts occur in specific countries or regions.
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_06
While we do not directly create a material positive impact on workers in the value chain, we focus on strengthening practices that address our negative impacts, enhancing conditions for workers within the areas of our operations and supply chain.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Has the undertaking disclosed whether all value chain workers, who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including those connected with its own operations, value chain, products, services, and business relationships, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48? Furthermore, has the undertaking provided information on any material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on these value chain workers?
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_07
We have assessed IROs related to workers in our value chain, focusing primarily on our first-tier suppliers’ workers but also workers further out in our supply chain, by using industry knowledge and internal knowledge based on our engagement in various forums. Workers in our value chain who are likely to be materially impacted by our operations and business relationships are included in the scope of our disclosures.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Has the undertaking developed an understanding of how workers with specific characteristics, those operating in particular contexts, or those engaged in specific activities may be at an increased risk of harm, and if so, how has this understanding been achieved? Please provide details in accordance with the materiality assessment outlined in ESRS 2 IRO-1, as it pertains to the main types of value chain workers who are or could be negatively affected.
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_08
Certain workers within these categories are especially vulnerable, such as migrant workers, women, young workers, minority ethnic groups, or those in unsafe work conditions. As part of our due diligence process, we conduct detailed assessments, including interviews, to understand how these vulnerable worker groups may face increased harm within our value chain. Based on our double materiality assessment (DMA), we have identified that workers in high-risk sectors like logistics, maritime operations, and mining, and in particular those working under vulnerable conditions, are more likely to experience issues related to unsafe employment practices.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 90%
- Identify and disclose any material risks and opportunities that arise from impacts and dependencies on your value chain workers, specifying if these relate to particular groups within the value chain workforce, such as specific age groups or workers in certain factories or countries, rather than the entire workforce.
-
Question Id: S2.SBM-3_09
Our material negative impacts on our suppliers’ and sub-contractors’ workers primarily relate to work-related rights violations, including excessive working hours, as well as concerns over safety for all workers engaged in our supply chain. There have also been known issues related to debt bondage, and state-imposed forced labour may occur in the solar PV supply chain. We are aware of a material risk related to forced labour allegations of inadequate labour protections and oversight in our supply chain for critical components. These include minerals and metals, such as rare earth elements for wind turbine magnets, copper for export or array cables, lithium for batteries, and silica for solar panels. These materials are often sourced from countries and areas in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, where enforcement of labour protections is weaker, increasing the risk of forced and child labour.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide detailed information regarding any specific policy provisions your organization has implemented to prevent and address impacts on indigenous peoples, as required by Disclosure Requirement S3-1 concerning policies related to affected communities.
-
Question Id: S3-1_01
Our 'Global Human rights policy' includes specific provisions to respect Indigenous land rights, cultures, and traditional practices, and it commits us to engaging with Indigenous communities early in the planning process of our renewable energy projects, ensuring their input is considered and incorporated into project design and implementation. This includes honoring the principles of FPIC as fundamental to our engagement strategy.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 95%