Orsted
ESRS disclosure
Tags Tree
- Provide the total number of incidents of discrimination, including harassment, reported during the reporting period, as required by Disclosure Requirement S1-17 concerning incidents, complaints, and severe human rights impacts.
-
Question Id: S1-17_01
In 2024, there were 5 substantiated cases of discrimination, including harassment.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 90%
- Provide the total number of incidents of discrimination, including harassment, reported during the reporting period, as required by Disclosure Requirement S1-17 concerning incidents, complaints, and severe human rights impacts.
-
Question Id: S1-17_02
In 2024, there were 5 substantiated cases of discrimination, including harassment.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 90%
- Provide the necessary contextual information to understand the data related to work-related grievances, incidents, and complaints concerning social and human rights matters, and detail the methodology used in compiling this data, as per Disclosure Requirement S1-17.
-
Question Id: S1-17_07
Our Audit & Risk Committee receives quarterly overviews of all inappropriate and illegal misconduct cases across jurisdictions that have either been managed or are in process locally. This reporting includes incidents of discrimination, including harassment, which in 2024 totaled 5 substantiated cases. A dedicated team in People & Culture is responsible for sending Internal Audit an anonymous global overview. A dedicated system is used to confidentially report on these cases, ensuring country-by-country access protection and only to authorised employees. For GDPR compliance, all data on employee cases are anonymous.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 70%
- Provide the total number of severe human rights incidents related to your workforce during the reporting period. Include details on how many of these incidents involve non-compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. If no such incidents have occurred, explicitly state this.
-
Question Id: S1-17_08
In 2024, we had zero severe human rights incidents connected to our employees.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 25%
- Provide the total number of severe human rights incidents associated with your workforce during the reporting period. Specify how many of these incidents constitute non-compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. If no such incidents have occurred, confirm this status.
-
Question Id: S1-17_09
In 2024, we had zero severe human rights incidents connected to our employees.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Has the undertaking identified any severe human rights incidents, such as forced labor, human trafficking, or child labor, connected to its workforce during the reporting period? If so, provide the number of such incidents and specify how many involve non-compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. If no such incidents have occurred, confirm this status.
-
Question Id: S1-17_10
In 2024, we had zero severe human rights incidents connected to our employees.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 90%
- Provide detailed information on the status of identified incidents and/or complaints related to severe human rights impacts, such as forced labor, human trafficking, or child labor. Include actions taken in response to these incidents, as per Disclosure Requirement S1-17, in addition to the information outlined in paragraphs 103 and 104.
-
Question Id: S1-17_13
In 2024, we had zero severe human rights incidents connected to our employees.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Does the undertaking disclose whether and how the perspectives of its own workforce inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing actual and potential impacts on its workforce? Include, where relevant, an explanation of the processes for engaging with the workforce and workers' representatives about these impacts.
-
Question Id: S1-2_01
At Ørsted, we believe in the importance of gaining direct insights and perspectives from our own workforce on a wide variety of matters. We see these insights as key aspects when outlining decisions and strategies. Our annual global People Matter survey aims at retrieving employees’ perspectives and opinions on satisfaction and motivation across almost 70 questions. The themes assessed within this anonymous survey include the degree of trust, openness, and transparency felt by our employees with regards to collaboration and the management bodies and the level of satisfaction within several aspects of the employees’ work life and conditions, e.g., job content, physical working conditions, compensation and employment terms, development opportunities, workload, stress, inclusion and diversity, and potential harassment at the workplace. The results are shared with the Group Executive Team for their strategic planning of priorities, activities, and follow-up actions. People leaders use the results within their respective teams to enable dialogues about potential improvement initiatives, ensuring a safe and inclusive working environment where everyone can thrive, perform, and grow.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Does the undertaking engage directly with its own workforce or their representatives to inform decisions or activities related to managing actual and potential impacts on its workforce? Provide details on the processes used for such engagement, including any relevant explanations.
-
Question Id: S1-2_02
Additionally, we have established an easily accessible site on our company intranet that outlines various options for employee representation on both global and local levels. These include various channels for employees to voice their opinions and engage both with other colleagues and with management. Such options include HR business partners, occupational health and safety representatives, different local works councils, cooperation committees, employment relations representatives, and personal development dialogues. Engagement and employee representation through more formal bodies, such as work councils and employment relations representatives, are generally regulated by local legislation or locally agreed with the respective employee representation body. The frequency of engagement is both regularly recurring meetings and extraordinary ones, summoned to discuss important topics related to the workforce.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed account of the processes your organization employs to engage with its own workforce and workers' representatives concerning the impacts on them. Specify whether and how the perspectives of your workforce influence decisions or activities related to managing actual and potential impacts. Include an explanation of the stages at which engagement occurs, the type of engagement, and the frequency of such engagement.
-
Question Id: S1-2_03
Our annual global People Matter survey aims at retrieving employees’ perspectives and opinions on satisfaction and motivation across almost 70 questions. The themes assessed within this anonymous survey include the degree of trust, openness, and transparency felt by our employees with regards to collaboration and the management bodies and the level of satisfaction within several aspects of the employees’ work life and conditions, e.g., job content, physical working conditions, compensation and employment terms, development opportunities, workload, stress, inclusion and diversity, and potential harassment at the workplace. The results are shared with the Group Executive Team for their strategic planning of priorities, activities, and follow-up actions. People leaders use the results within their respective teams to enable dialogues about potential improvement initiatives, ensuring a safe and inclusive working environment where everyone can thrive, perform, and grow. Additionally, we have established an easily accessible site on our company intranet that outlines various options for employee representation on both global and local levels. These include various channels for employees to voice their opinions and engage both with other colleagues and with management. Such options include HR business partners, occupational health and safety representatives, different local works councils, cooperation committees, employment relations representatives, and personal development dialogues. Engagement and employee representation through more formal bodies, such as work councils and employment relations representatives, are generally regulated by local legislation or locally agreed with the respective employee representation body. The frequency of engagement is both regularly recurring meetings and extraordinary ones, summoned to discuss important topics related to the workforce.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%