The document discusses various GHG removal projects such as the use of construction materials like concrete that absorb carbon, bio-based alternatives like timber, and projects involving extensive recultivation and rehabilitation services. However, it does not provide specific measurements in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent.

The document does not provide detailed information on GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits.

The document does not mention any GHG removal activities that have been converted into carbon credits and sold on the voluntary market.

The document discusses GHG removals as part of the company's climate change mitigation strategy, mentioning the use of innovative materials and sustainable processes. However, it does not explicitly state public claims of GHG neutrality involving carbon credits.

The document does not provide a detailed explanation regarding public claims of GHG neutrality involving carbon credits and their impact on GHG emission reduction targets.

The document does not provide a detailed explanation of public claims of GHG neutrality involving carbon credits and their support by GHG emission reduction targets.

We do not yet have internal carbon pricing. We took preliminary steps toward developing such a carbon price in the reporting year. We have developed an initial approach that has not yet been implemented but is currently being tested and analyzed. The aim is to create an effective system in the future that helps cut carbon emissions across all project phases while remaining cost-effective. Our experience in pilot projects to date shows that incorporating an internal carbon price into the subcontracting award process is a useful approach. Initial successes with taking subcontractors’ carbon footprint into account in a pilot project encourage us to take this approach further. It creates incentives for our subcontractors to develop and implement innovative and low-emission solutions.

We do not yet have internal carbon pricing. We took preliminary steps toward developing such a carbon price in the reporting year. We have developed an initial approach that has not yet been implemented but is currently being tested and analyzed. The aim is to create an effective system in the future that helps cut carbon emissions across all project phases while remaining cost-effective. Our experience in pilot projects to date shows that incorporating an internal carbon price into the subcontracting award process is a useful approach. Initial successes with taking subcontractors’ carbon footprint into account in a pilot project encourage us to take this approach further. It creates incentives for our subcontractors to develop and implement innovative and low-emission solutions.

We do not yet have internal carbon pricing. We took preliminary steps toward developing such a carbon price in the reporting year. We have developed an initial approach that has not yet been implemented but is currently being tested and analyzed. The aim is to create an effective system in the future that helps cut carbon emissions across all project phases while remaining cost-effective. Our experience in pilot projects to date shows that incorporating an internal carbon price into the subcontracting award process is a useful approach. Initial successes with taking subcontractors’ carbon footprint into account in a pilot project encourage us to take this approach further. It creates incentives for our subcontractors to develop and implement innovative and low-emission solutions.

We do not yet have internal carbon pricing. We took preliminary steps toward developing such a carbon price in the reporting year. We have developed an initial approach that has not yet been implemented but is currently being tested and analyzed.