GN Store Nord
ESRS disclosure: IRO-1_10
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of the methodology employed to identify, evaluate, prioritize, and monitor risks and opportunities with potential financial implications. Specifically, elucidate how sustainability-related risks are prioritized in comparison to other risk categories, including the application of risk-assessment tools.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_10
To assess the materiality of IROs in terms of financial risks or opportunities, we used the same prioritization in terms of value chain industries and economic activities in our own operations as impact scoring. We used our existing enterprise risk management mechanism to score risks on a 0-5 scale, meaning we gave equal weight to likelihood and two factors constituting magnitude combined: revenue impact and reputational risk. For revenue impact, we used the same thresholds as for other risks to score risks between minor and critical, thereby giving equal weight to sustainability-related risks as to other risks. Our double materiality process is aligned with our enterprise risk management and overall business strategy processes, as we use the insights gathered in the double materiality assessment to improve our assessment of the relative financial risk materiality of ESG topics to inform business decisions related to risk mitigation in accordance with the overall enterprise risk management process. For opportunities, we apply the same process where instead of financial risk we assess the relative financial upside.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%