GN Store Nord
ESRS disclosure: ESRS ESRS 2 \ DR BP-1
Tags Tree
- Provide information on whether the sustainability statement has been prepared on a consolidated or individual basis, as per Disclosure Requirement BP-1 – General basis for preparation of the sustainability statement.
-
Question Id: BP-1_01
GN’s Sustainability Statement is reported based on the same consolidation principles as the financial statements, covering all GN divisions, markets, and global levels.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 90%
- Confirm whether the scope of consolidation for the consolidated sustainability statement aligns with that of the financial statements. If not applicable, declare whether the reporting undertaking is exempt from preparing financial statements or is preparing consolidated sustainability reporting in accordance with Article 48i of Directive 2013/34/EU.
-
Question Id: BP-1_02
GN’s Sustainability Statement is reported based on the same consolidation principles as the financial statements, covering all GN divisions, markets, and global levels.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 95%
- Provide a detailed account of the extent to which the sustainability statement encompasses the undertaking's upstream and downstream value chain, as stipulated in Disclosure Requirement BP-1 concerning the general basis for preparation of the sustainability statement.
-
Question Id: BP-1_04
Following the materiality assessment and due diligence processes, this Sustainability Statement covers all upstream and downstream value chain activities.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed explanation of the process your organization employs to identify, assess, prioritize, and monitor potential and actual impacts on people and the environment. This should be informed by your due diligence process and include an account of how negative impacts are prioritized based on their relative severity and likelihood. Additionally, if applicable, describe how positive impacts are prioritized based on their relative scale, scope, and likelihood. Clarify how these processes determine which sustainability matters are deemed material for reporting purposes, referencing any qualitative or quantitative thresholds and other criteria as outlined in ESRS 1 section 3.4 on Impact Materiality.
-
Question Id: IRO-1_06
In scoring impacts, we gave equal weight to the three factors constituting severity combined (scale, scope, and irremediable character), and likelihood, prioritizing negative impacts based on their relative severity and likelihood. We applied three analytical approaches in our double materiality process: Desk research: we consulted 40 reports from NGOs, governments, and key suppliers. Internal workshops: we held five internal workshops with 27 subject matter experts. External stakeholder interviews: we interviewed eight external stakeholders, constituting both readers of the report and impacted stakeholders. We selected external stakeholders based on the areas where we lacked visibility through our existing stakeholder engagement mechanisms: pollution, resource outflows, and human rights impacts far down our supply chain. We assumed our impacts and risks to be similar to industry averages in cases where we lacked clear data or were unable to allocate impacts prevalent to GN in our value chain. Our double materiality assessment was subject to ongoing review by senior management. It was formally approved by the Audit Committee in August 2024.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%