GN Store Nord
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 e
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed explanation of any objectives or plans related to capital expenditures (CapEx), capital expenditure plans (CapEx plans), and operational expenditures (OpEx) that your undertaking has formulated to align its economic activities, including revenues, CapEx, and OpEx, with the criteria set forth in Commission Delegated Regulation 2021/2139, as required under Disclosure Requirement E1-1 concerning the transition plan for climate change mitigation.
-
Question Id: E1-1_08
For these reasons, we also do not expect alignment of our economic activities with the delegated act on climate objectives to change significantly in the future. However, a small increase in CAPEX and OPEX alignment may be expected in eligible economic activities such as construction of new buildings and production facilities (CCM/CCA 7.1), building renovation measures (CCM/CCA 7.2), energy efficiency initiatives at our facilities (CCM/CCA 7.3), installation of onsite renewable energy capacity (CCM/CCA 7.6) and electrification of our car fleet (CCM/CCA 7.4) which are actions we will take to ensure we meet our near- and long-term climate targets.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%
- Provide a detailed account of the resilience of your strategy and business model concerning climate change. Include a comprehensive description of the scope of the resilience analysis as per the Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3, focusing on material impacts, risks, and opportunities and their interaction with your strategy and business model.
-
Question Id: E1.SBM-3_02
Risks and opportunities have been assessed by looking at our impacts in terms of financial loss or gain and reputational damage or gain. The assessment used our product life cycle assessments (LCA), corporate GHG accounting and publicly available tools, such as the WWF Water Risk Filter and climate impact projections from IPCC AR6. We also looked at historical incidence of extreme weather events and consequent disruption in own operations and supply chain as well as cost variability, and expected changes to, for example, carbon taxes placed on GN goods. Physical and transition risks We applied different climate scenario analysis over the short, medium and long term to identify and assess climate-related acute and chronic physical risks, such as extreme weather events, heat and water stress and sea level rise, as well as transition risks, such as carbon pricing, regulatory change, changing customer behavior, and availability of materials. For climate-related physical risks, geolocations data for our facilities and those of our suppliers was used to assess relevant risks. A high-level qualitative assessment was carried out using the RCP8.5, IEA Net-Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario (NZE) and IEA STEPS scenarios. The RCP8.5 scenario gives us the likely upper end of risk exposure of the business to climate-related hazards in the future. Here, the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 3 was chosen to reflect recent trends in international affairs. The IEA’s new Net Zero Roadmap report and IEA’s NZE and STEPS scenario were applied to identify and assess climate-related transition risks and opportunities that GN may face in the future if the world pursues a path to net-zero emissions by 2050 or if climate action is less aggressive and policymaking is assumed to remain as today.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%