GN Store Nord
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 c
Tags Tree
- Provide a detailed account of your organization's significant operational and capital expenditures necessary for the execution of your climate change mitigation transition plan, as outlined in Disclosure Requirement E1-1. This should include an explanation and quantification of investments and funding, referencing the key performance indicators of taxonomy-aligned capital expenditures, and, where applicable, the capital expenditure plans disclosed in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178.
-
Question Id: E1-1_04
For these reasons, we also do not expect alignment of our economic activities with the delegated act on climate objectives to change significantly in the future. However, a small increase in CAPEX and OPEX alignment may be expected in eligible economic activities such as construction of new buildings and production facilities (CCM/CCA 7.1), building renovation measures (CCM/CCA 7.2), energy efficiency initiatives at our facilities (CCM/CCA 7.3), installation of onsite renewable energy capacity (CCM/CCA 7.6) and electrification of our car fleet (CCM/CCA 7.4) which are actions we will take to ensure we meet our near- and long-term climate targets.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 65%
- Has the undertaking utilized climate-related scenario analysis to inform the identification of transition events and the assessment of exposure, specifically considering scenarios aligned with the Paris Agreement and limiting climate change to 1.5°C, such as those provided by the International Energy Agency or the Network for Greening the Financial System? Please detail the processes employed to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks, and opportunities, as stipulated in Disclosure Requirement E1-9 and ESRS 2 IRO-1.
-
Question Id: E1.IRO-1_13
Physical and transition risks We applied different climate scenario analysis over the short, medium and long term to identify and assess climate-related acute and chronic physical risks, such as extreme weather events, heat and water stress and sea level rise, as well as transition risks, such as carbon pricing, regulatory change, changing customer behavior, and availability of materials. For climate-related physical risks, geolocations data for our facilities and those of our suppliers was used to assess relevant risks.
A high-level qualitative assessment was carried out using the RCP8.5, IEA Net-Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario (NZE) and IEA STEPS scenarios. The RCP8.5 scenario gives us the likely upper end of risk exposure of the business to climate-related hazards in the future. Here, the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 3 was chosen to reflect recent trends in international affairs. The IEA’s new Net Zero Roadmap report and IEA’s NZE and STEPS scenario were applied to identify and assess climate-related transition risks and opportunities that GN may face in the future if the world pursues a path to net-zero emissions by 2050 or if climate action is less aggressive and policymaking is assumed to remain as today.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%