GN Store Nord
ESRS disclosure: E1.IRO-1_05
Tags Tree
- Has your company defined short-, medium-, and long-term time horizons in relation to anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks, as well as potential climate-related opportunities? Additionally, explain how these definitions are linked to the expected lifetime of your assets, strategic planning horizons, and capital allocation plans, in accordance with the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks, and opportunities.
-
Question Id: E1.IRO-1_05
GN broadly aligns time horizons for ESG-related risk assessment with that of the Corporate Risk Management (CRM) process, which apply a 1-to-3-year horizon (0 to 1 years for short-term and 2 to 3 years for medium-term). While our short-term time horizon is aligned with that of the ESRS-defined time horizons, the medium- and long-term time horizons deviate slightly. The main reason for this is to align with the existing CRM process. In the context of both climate-related physical and transition risks, the 1-to-3-year horizon is part of the CRM process, whereas longer term climate-related risks are considered only as part of the double materiality process, as well as in conjunction with the scenario analysis, where we have defined a 10-30 year long-term time horizon. From the scenario analysis, we assessed GN’s exposure to climate-related hazards and transition events in our own operations and across the value chain.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%