GN Store Nord
ESRS disclosure
Tags Tree
- Does the undertaking disclose the process for setting targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities, specifically detailing whether and how direct engagement with workers in the value chain, their legitimate representatives, or credible proxies with insight into their situation, was conducted? Additionally, when disclosing the embedding of external-facing policies related to value chain workers, does the undertaking consider internal policies of responsible sourcing and alignment with other relevant policies, such as those addressing forced labour? Furthermore, does the summary of supplier codes of conduct indicate whether they include provisions addressing worker safety, precarious work, human trafficking, forced labour, or child labour, and confirm that these provisions are fully in line with applicable ILO standards?
-
Question Id: S2-1_07
The targets have been set directly relating to value chain workers, such as aiming to reduce negative or advancing positive impacts, or to manage our material risks and opportunities. We have defined a process for setting targets relating to human rights due diligence, but we have not engaged directly with value chain workers, their legitimate representatives, or credible proxies, in setting them, nor in tracking the performance, or in identifying lessons or improvement as a result of our performance. Moving into 2025, we also plan to undertake a comprehensive review of these policy areas to understand any applicable targets that can be set in relation to workers in the value chain. GN’s overall ambition in this sphere reflects our drive to strengthen our due diligence processes and efforts in tracking effectiveness to monitor our progress connected to impacts on value chain workers.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Provide a detailed account of whether and how your company's policies concerning value chain workers align with internationally recognized instruments pertinent to value chain workers, such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Additionally, disclose the extent to which any instances of non-compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises have been reported within your upstream and downstream value chain. If applicable, include an indication of the nature of such cases.
-
Question Id: S2-1_08
GN is committed to the UN’s principles of responsible business, having been a signatory of the UN Global Compact since 2010. Over the last reporting period, we have observed no cases of non-respect to these principles involving value chain workers in our upstream or downstream value chain.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 75%
- Provide a detailed account of whether and how your company's policies concerning value chain workers align with internationally recognized standards, specifically the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Additionally, disclose the extent to which any instances of non-compliance with these principles, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises have been identified within your upstream and downstream value chain. If applicable, include an indication of the nature of such cases.
-
Question Id: S2-1_09
GN is committed to the UN’s principles of responsible business, having been a signatory of the UN Global Compact since 2010. Over the last reporting period, we have observed no cases of non-respect to these principles involving value chain workers in our upstream or downstream value chain.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 70%
- Provide a detailed explanation of any significant changes to the policies adopted during the reporting year, specifically in relation to Disclosure Requirement S2-5. This should include the process for setting targets concerning the management of material negative impacts, the advancement of positive impacts, and the management of material risks and opportunities. Additionally, clarify whether and how the undertaking engaged directly with workers in the value chain, their legitimate representatives, or credible proxies with insight into their situation, as outlined in Disclosure Requirement S2-1. Include any new expectations for suppliers or new approaches to due diligence and remedy.
-
Question Id: S2-1_10
The targets have been set directly relating to value chain workers, such as aiming to reduce negative or advancing positive impacts, or to manage our material risks and opportunities. We have defined a process for setting targets relating to human rights due diligence, but we have not engaged directly with value chain workers, their legitimate representatives, or credible proxies, in setting them, nor in tracking the performance, or in identifying lessons or improvement as a result of our performance. Moving into 2025, we also plan to undertake a comprehensive review of these policy areas to understand any applicable targets that can be set in relation to workers in the value chain. GN’s overall ambition in this sphere reflects our drive to strengthen our due diligence processes and efforts in tracking effectiveness to monitor our progress connected to impacts on value chain workers.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 65%
- Provide a detailed account of the methods and channels used to communicate your policies to relevant individuals, groups, or entities. This includes those responsible for implementing the policies, such as employees, contractors, and suppliers, as well as those with a vested interest in their execution, like workers and investors. Include any communication tools utilized, such as flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face-to-face interactions, or engagement with workers' representatives. Additionally, describe any measures taken to ensure accessibility and comprehension of the policies, such as translation into relevant languages or the use of visual aids. This disclosure should align with the requirements set forth in Disclosure Requirement S2-5 and S2-1, focusing on the process of setting targets related to managing material impacts and risks within the value chain.
-
Question Id: S2-1_11
We are in continuous dialogue with our stakeholders to ensure we understand their requirements and find ways to work in partnership to strengthen our business and the societies in which we operate. This chapter covers who we consider our key stakeholders. Views of stakeholders related to sustainability are shared with Executive Management and the Board of Directors as part of overall sustainability governance.
Customers: Customer-centricity is a key pillar of our strategy, which is why we continuously proactively engage with customers to understand their needs. Customer engagement takes place through direct dialogues, customer councils, and surveys. Views of customers are integrated into the development of our strategy and in the design of our products and services. ESG topics are integrated into customer dialogues, so that we can support customers in achieving their ESG objectives such as sustainable procurement or decarbonization targets. ESG is also integrated in customer dialogues as part of assessing potential upstream impacts and risks.
Employees: To ensure the well-being of our employees and maintain a diverse, engaged, and passionate workforce, employee engagement takes place on an ongoing basis through several channels: biannual professional and personal development dialogues, employee surveys, and employee groups representing specific demographics and their allies. Employees are also represented in the Board of Directors through the employee-elected board members. Employees can raise concerns confidentially through GN’s whistleblower hotline or regular HR channels. Views of employees collected through these channels are integrated in strategy development, policy creations, adjustments, and other decision-making on a continuous basis. Where necessary, specific initiatives are developed to ensure employee well-being. Employees are informed about ESG topics regularly through internal communication channels, which also allow for engagement on topics communicated.
Investors: It is GN’s investor relations and communication policy to have an open and active dialogue with our existing shareholders, potential shareholders, other investors, financial analysts, and the media. GN ensures that relevant information is provided to the financial community in a timely manner to ensure that the GN share is fairly priced. This is done in the form of company announcements, press releases, investor meetings, conferences, and presentations of GN’s interim and annual financial results.
Following the release of interim and annual financial results, GN hosts roadshows where the Executive Management and the investor relations team inform shareholders, other investors, and financial analysts about the recent developments in GN.
Moreover, when relevant, GN maintains a good dialogue with proxy advisors and other external advisors ahead of the Annual General Meeting.
As a public company, GN discloses ESG data in relevant areas via our integrated annual report, our Annual General Meeting, and where relevant on request to ESG rating agencies and investors. To ensure our ESG disclosures always meet investor requirements, we welcome dialogue with our investors on ESG topics at any time. In 2024, we continued to make ESG a prominent part of our proactive communication with investors.
Regulatory authorities: In support of our policy objective to proactively comply with all ESG legislation, GN assesses relevant regulations on an ongoing basis to ensure we comply with all relevant legislation, and where needed engage directly with policy makers to fully understand the implications of specific legislation for GN. We only engage policy makers on the shaping of future legislation through industry associations such as EHIMA, Danish Industry, and the Responsible Business Alliance, in line with their policy positions. New legislation is emerging in the area of product sustainability, including further chemical restrictions, right to repair, and battery legislation. On a corporate level, aside from CSRD, we closely monitor legislation in the area of ESG due diligence (CSDDD) and human rights-related laws across many different geographies. Where necessary we adjust our strategy, product, and service offerings to comply with legislation.
Suppliers: We engage with suppliers on an ongoing basis as part of regular business processes. We expect our suppliers to uphold the standards set out in our Supplier Code of Conduct and several supporting policies, employing a variety of tools to ensure compliance. Supplier ESG performance, based on their EcoVadis score and decarbonization maturity, is integrated into overall supplier performance and preference assessments. Where this is strategically relevant, we work in partnership with our suppliers to achieve joint business and ESG objectives.
Industry and ESG associations: GN is a member of several industry and ESG-related associations, for the purpose of demonstrating commitment to jointly developed standards and policy positions, engaging with industry peers on industry-spanning issues, tracking legislation and engaging with policy makers through representatives of these organizations.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 65%
- Provide a detailed account of whether and how the perspectives of value chain workers are integrated into your company's decision-making processes or activities concerning the management of actual and potential impacts on these workers. Include, where applicable, an explanation of the methods and processes employed in engaging with value chain workers regarding these impacts.
-
Question Id: S2-2_01
As part of GN’s ongoing due diligence processes, we engage with value chain workers via credible proxies regarding our material impacts that are likely to affect them. All tier 1 contract manufacturers are audited every year, whereas tier 2 suppliers are audited every second year. These audits are based on the UN Global Compact principles of responsible business and the SA8000 standard, which address our material human rights impacts and risks.
During audits, we engage with management functions, such as human resources or operations, by random selection for interviews to gain insights into any work-related issues, hiring practices, and other relevant topics, particularly considering vulnerable or marginalized workers, such as minorities, persons with disabilities, and migrant workers. Following the interview, an assessment is performed to ensure working hours, treatment by superiors, safety, and salary are compliant with our standards and local legislations. Where major audit findings are evident, GN requires these to be addressed through corrective actions. Engagement during supplier audits in our upstream value chain informs our business decisions and ongoing collaboration with suppliers. We also ensure that any major findings from our engagement with value chain workers are incorporated into relevant improvement requirements for our suppliers, as well as to ensure that they comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Does the undertaking engage directly with value chain workers or their legitimate representatives, or utilize credible proxies with insight into their situation, to inform decisions or activities aimed at managing actual and potential impacts on value chain workers?
-
Question Id: S2-2_02
As part of GN’s ongoing due diligence processes, we engage with value chain workers via credible proxies regarding our material impacts that are likely to affect them. All tier 1 contract manufacturers are audited every year, whereas tier 2 suppliers are audited every second year. These audits are based on the UN Global Compact principles of responsible business and the SA8000 standard, which address our material human rights impacts and risks.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide detailed information regarding the processes your organization employs to engage with value chain workers concerning impacts. Specify whether and how the perspectives of these workers influence your decision-making or activities related to managing actual and potential impacts on them. Include an explanation of the stage(s) at which engagement occurs, the type of engagement, and the frequency of such engagements.
-
Question Id: S2-2_03
As part of GN’s ongoing due diligence processes, we engage with value chain workers via credible proxies regarding our material impacts that are likely to affect them. All tier 1 contract manufacturers are audited every year, whereas tier 2 suppliers are audited every second year. These audits are based on the UN Global Compact principles of responsible business and the SA8000 standard, which address our material human rights impacts and risks.
During audits, we engage with management functions, such as human resources or operations, by random selection for interviews to gain insights into any work-related issues, hiring practices, and other relevant topics, particularly considering vulnerable or marginalized workers, such as minorities, persons with disabilities, and migrant workers. Following the interview, an assessment is performed to ensure working hours, treatment by superiors, safety, and salary are compliant with our standards and local legislations. Where major audit findings are evident, GN requires these to be addressed through corrective actions. Engagement during supplier audits in our upstream value chain informs our business decisions and ongoing collaboration with suppliers. We also ensure that any major findings from our engagement with value chain workers are incorporated into relevant improvement requirements for our suppliers, as well as to ensure that they comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Identify and describe the function and the most senior role within your organization that holds operational responsibility for ensuring engagement with value chain workers occurs, and that the outcomes of such engagement inform your organization's approach. Provide details on whether and how the perspectives of value chain workers influence your decisions or activities aimed at managing actual and potential impacts on them.
-
Question Id: S2-2_04
GN’s Supplier Code of Conduct is managed by GN’s Group Business Ethics and Compliance department, which is responsible for ensuring that all requirements are implemented in our engagements with suppliers.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed account of whether and how the perspectives of value chain workers are integrated into your decision-making processes or activities concerning the management of actual and potential impacts on these workers. Include, where applicable, a description of any Global Framework Agreements or other agreements with global union federations that pertain to the respect of human rights of workers within the value chain. Additionally, explain how such agreements facilitate the undertaking's understanding of the workers' perspectives, particularly in relation to their right to bargain collectively.
-
Question Id: S2-2_05
GN is committed to ensuring that human rights are safeguarded and that we manage our material sustainability matters related to value chain workers. Our human rights policy commitments cover all value chain workers across all geographies in which we operate to enable identification, assessment, and management, or remediation of our material IROs. GN is committed to the UN’s principles of responsible business, having been a signatory of the UN Global Compact since 2010.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%