GN Store Nord
ESRS disclosure
Tags Tree
- Provide information on whether the sustainability statement has been prepared on a consolidated or individual basis, as per Disclosure Requirement BP-1 – General basis for preparation of the sustainability statement.
-
Question Id: BP-1_01
GN’s Sustainability Statement is reported based on the same consolidation principles as the financial statements, covering all GN divisions, markets, and global levels.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 90%
- Confirm whether the scope of consolidation for the consolidated sustainability statement aligns with that of the financial statements. If not applicable, declare whether the reporting undertaking is exempt from preparing financial statements or is preparing consolidated sustainability reporting in accordance with Article 48i of Directive 2013/34/EU.
-
Question Id: BP-1_02
GN’s Sustainability Statement is reported based on the same consolidation principles as the financial statements, covering all GN divisions, markets, and global levels.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 95%
- Provide a detailed account of the extent to which the sustainability statement encompasses the undertaking's upstream and downstream value chain, as stipulated in Disclosure Requirement BP-1 concerning the general basis for preparation of the sustainability statement.
-
Question Id: BP-1_04
Following the materiality assessment and due diligence processes, this Sustainability Statement covers all upstream and downstream value chain activities.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Has your organization deviated from the medium- or long-term time horizons as defined by ESRS 1, section 6.4 for reporting purposes? If so, provide a detailed description of your definitions of medium- or long-term time horizons.
-
Question Id: BP-2_01
Overall, like any other risk, our risks are integrated in our strategy and business model through enterprise risk management processes, whereas managing our impacts is anchored in compliance with relevant legislation, as well as integration of additional policies, actions, and targets of our strategy and our business model where managing the impact requires additional efforts. We have assessed the time horizon for impacts to be the strategy period until 2028, as we lack clarity beyond that to accurately assess the materiality of impacts.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed explanation for any deviations from the medium- or long-term time horizons as defined by ESRS 1, section 6.4, "Definition of short-, medium-, and long-term," in your reporting practices.
-
Question Id: BP-2_02
We have assessed the time horizon for impacts to be the strategy period until 2028, as we lack clarity beyond that to accurately assess the materiality of impacts.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 65%
- Identify the metrics that incorporate upstream and/or downstream value chain data estimated using indirect sources, such as sector-average data or other proxies.
-
Question Id: BP-2_03
Some environmental metrics, particularly in Scope 3, have been estimated based on ten months of actual data. For pollution data, we do not have completeness across our sites so we have estimated using data from sites with similar activities.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide a detailed description of the basis for preparation when metrics incorporate upstream and/or downstream value chain data estimated using indirect sources, including sector-average data or other proxies.
-
Question Id: BP-2_04
To improve data completeness, we will expand LCA coverage of our portfolio, collect pollution data from more sites and, where material and strategically relevant, increase supplier engagement and streamline internal processes to use more full-year data instead.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Provide a detailed description of the resulting level of accuracy for metrics that incorporate upstream and/or downstream value chain data estimated using indirect sources, including sector-average data or other proxies.
-
Question Id: BP-2_05
Some of the environmental metrics in this report are subject to measurement uncertainty because of the limited availability of primary data, especially where we require data from downstream in the value chain.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed description of the planned actions your company intends to implement to enhance the accuracy of metrics that incorporate value chain data estimated using indirect sources, such as sector-average data or other proxies, in accordance with ESRS 1 chapter 5 on Value Chain.
-
Question Id: BP-2_06
To improve data completeness, we will expand LCA coverage of our portfolio, collect pollution data from more sites and, where material and strategically relevant, increase supplier engagement and streamline internal processes to use more full-year data instead.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Identify and disclose the quantitative metrics and monetary amounts that are subject to a high level of measurement uncertainty, as per ESRS 1 section 7.2 regarding sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty.
-
Question Id: BP-2_07
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Scope 3 category 1, related to indirect procurement, and category 2 (capital goods) measurements are based on spend data and industry average emission factors. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Scope 3 category 6 (business travel) measurements include an extrapolation for travel spend in the minority of cases where travel has not been booked through agency partners. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Scope 3 category 7 (employee commuting) measurements are uncertain because of a lack of data on office occupancy, particularly in 2021 in light of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%