This Statement has been prepared on a consolidated basis.

The scope of consolidation corresponds to Ferrari N.V.’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Sustainability Statement covers our upstream and downstream value chain with respect to policies and actions related to material IROs identified along our value chain.

We did not use the option to omit a specific piece of information corresponding to intellectual property know-how or the results of innovation.

We did not use the option to omit any exemption from disclosure of impending developments or matters in the course of negotiation.

In this phase, we defined the criteria and scales to assess the IROs. In particular, we assessed our impact (inside-out perspective) taking into account their severity and likelihood. The severity was assessed using 1 (small) to 5 (extreme) scoring, considering scale, scope and for negative impact irremediability. The likelihood was assessed using 1 (unlikely) to 5 (very likely) scoring. Both negative and positive impacts were evaluated gross (before any mitigating actions). For the financial materiality analysis (outside-in perspective), risks were assessed according to the ERM methodology involving residual evaluation by severity and likelihood. Whereas opportunities were assessed according to criteria and metrics defined on the basis of the ERM methodology, considering residual evaluation by severity and likelihood. For risks, three variables (likelihood, impact and preparedness) are assessed independently on the basis of company metrics; these elements are then multiplied and the product obtained through this operation, defined overall risk exposure, is the input for placing risks on a heat map that has four different risk areas (Tier 1, Tier 2, Watching Area, Residual Area). The severity was assessed using 1 (very low) to 5 (very high) scoring, considering four different drivers of evaluation: strategic/market, economic/financial, operational and reputational. Additionally, the final score of severity resulted also from considering the preparedness, which is the degree of control, protection and readiness that Ferrari ensures thanks to the current actions, processes and levers, and their effectiveness. The likelihood was assessed using 1 (very low) to 5 (very high) scoring considering three different drivers: qualitative (uncertain contexts), quantitative (measurable contexts) and frequency (predictable contexts). During the evaluation process we assessed each IROs within the most relevant time horizon, considering short, medium and long term as described in ESRS 1 and considering the impact related both to our own operations and to our upstream and downstream value chain.