Ferrari
ESRS disclosure: ESRS E1 \ DR E1-1 \ Paragraph 16 d
Tags Tree
- Provide a qualitative assessment of the potential locked-in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from your company's key assets and products. Explain whether and how these emissions could jeopardize the achievement of your GHG emission reduction targets and contribute to transition risk. Additionally, if applicable, describe your company's plans to manage its GHG-intensive and energy-intensive assets and products.
-
Question Id: E1-1_07
We are aware that the transition to a climate-neutral economy could be slowed down by locked-in GHG emissions. Regarding Scope 1 and 2, certain processes cannot be converted to electricity yet. For Scope 3 downstream, the locked-in emissions depend on how the market will evolve in the coming years, in particular on the share of BEVs (Battery Electric Vehicle). However, it is important to point out that the higher the share of BEVs, the harder it is to reach the target set for Scope 3 upstream. We are developing plans to reduce emissions from downstream ICEs, and in particular, we are evaluating various technologies, including alternative fuels.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 80%
- Has the undertaking considered a diverse range of climate scenarios, including at least one scenario compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C, to identify relevant environmental, societal, technology, market, and policy-related developments and determine its decarbonisation levers, as required under Disclosure Requirement E1-4? Additionally, if applicable, provide an explanation of the anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities as outlined in Disclosure Requirement E1-9, ensuring that the disclosure aligns with the qualitative characteristics of useful information as specified in ESRS 1 Appendix B.
-
Question Id: E1-4_24
In 2022, to strengthen our resilience strategy, we conducted a Climate Scenario Analysis of our prospective climate change risks, both physical and transitional, for our plants in Maranello and Modena and for our value chain following the most up-to-date methodologies available internationally, covering the 2030 to 2050 time-horizon. In 2024, the assumptions of this analysis remained unchanged. The choice of the scenarios for physical and transitional risks is based on EU and international guidelines (i.e. EU Taxonomy and TCFD respectively), on climate literature, availability of impact studies and likelihood of scenarios. We used the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios along with the Swiss RE, Moody’s Analytics, and Wood Mackenzie international databases.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%