Cellnex
ESRS disclosure
Tags Tree
- Provide metrics regarding species at global extinction risk if your organization has identified material impacts related to the state of species. Report any relevant metrics that measure these impacts.
-
Question Id: E4-5_21
Cellnex has identified potential impacts on birdlife caused by its operations as particularly important for the company. Given that the telecommunication infrastructure consists of large towers, the assets can make for attractive nesting sites for a variety of bird species. Particularly, the presence of hawks and storks has been thoroughly evaluated. In some of the involved countries, empty nests are removed from the assets after the conclusion of the nesting season, if local regulations allow for this. These actions are aimed to reduce the risk of disturbing birds returning to the same nesting site in the following season.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Provide metrics that assess the threat status of species and evaluate how the company's activities or pressures may influence this threat status, in accordance with Disclosure Requirement E4-5 concerning impact metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change.
-
Question Id: E4-5_22
Cellnex has identified potential impacts on birdlife caused by its operations as particularly important for the company. Given that the telecommunication infrastructure consists of large towers, the assets can make for attractive nesting sites for a variety of bird species. Particularly, the presence of hawks and storks has been thoroughly evaluated. In some of the involved countries, empty nests are removed from the assets after the conclusion of the nesting season, if local regulations allow for this. These actions are aimed to reduce the risk of disturbing birds returning to the same nesting site in the following season.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Has the undertaking identified material impacts concerning the state of species, and if so, can it report metrics deemed relevant? Specifically, can the undertaking disclose metrics on species at extinction risk that measure changes in the relevant habitat for a threatened species, serving as a proxy for the undertaking's impact on the local population's extinction risk?
-
Question Id: E4-5_23
Cellnex has identified potential impacts on birdlife caused by its operations as particularly important for the company. Given that the telecommunication infrastructure consists of large towers, the assets can make for attractive nesting sites for a variety of bird species. Particularly, the presence of hawks and storks has been thoroughly evaluated. In some of the involved countries, empty nests are removed from the assets after the conclusion of the nesting season, if local regulations allow for this. These actions are aimed to reduce the risk of disturbing birds returning to the same nesting site in the following season.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Has the undertaking identified any material impacts related to ecosystems, and if so, can you provide metrics that measure the area coverage of the affected ecosystems, such as habitat or forest cover, without considering the quality or condition of these areas?
-
Question Id: E4-5_24
Ecosystem Type Surface area assets (km²) Surface area assets (%) 1. Artificial surfaces 5.86 56.9% 2.1. Homogeneous Agricultural Area 2.69 26.1% 2.2. Heterogeneous Agricultural area 0.67 6.5% 3.1. Forests 0.64 6.2% 3.2. Shrub and/or herbaceous 0.37 3.6% 3.3. Open spaces with little or no vegetation 0.03 0.3% 4. Wetlands 0.03 0.3% Grand Total 10.30 100.0% Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 85%
- Provide metrics that measure the quality of ecosystems in relation to a pre-determined reference state, as required under Disclosure Requirement E4-5 concerning impact metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change, if material impacts on ecosystems have been identified.
-
Question Id: E4-5_25
The GBS integrates a variety of pressures into a single standardized impact score called MSA.km². This stands for Mean Species Abundance, where 1 MSA.km² equals the conversion of 1 km² of natural ecosystem into a fully artificial ecosystem.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Provide metrics that measure multiple species within an ecosystem, focusing on species richness and abundance indicators. These metrics should assess the development of native species composition within the ecosystem, comparing it to the reference state at the beginning of the first reporting period and the targeted state as outlined in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Additionally, include an aggregation of species' conservation status if applicable.
-
Question Id: E4-5_26
The GBS integrates a variety of pressures into a single standardized impact score called MSA.km². This stands for Mean Species Abundance, where 1 MSA.km² equals the conversion of 1 km² of natural ecosystem into a fully artificial ecosystem.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Provide metrics reflecting the structural components of ecosystem condition, specifically focusing on habitat connectivity, if material impacts related to ecosystems have been identified.
-
Question Id: E4-5_27
The GBS integrates a variety of pressures into a single standardized impact score called MSA.km². This stands for Mean Species Abundance, where 1 MSA.km² equals the conversion of 1 km² of natural ecosystem into a fully artificial ecosystem.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Provide a detailed account of the anticipated financial effects stemming from material risks and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystem impacts and dependencies. This disclosure should include a monetary quantification of these effects before considering any biodiversity and ecosystem-related actions, unless such quantification would incur undue cost or effort. In cases where quantification is not feasible, qualitative information should be provided. For financial effects arising from material opportunities, quantification is not mandatory if it compromises the qualitative characteristics of the information as outlined in ESRS 1 Appendix B. The monetary quantification may be presented as a single figure or a range.
-
Question Id: E4-6_02
All the risks mentioned in the table are considered to have a low potential financial impact for the Company, having been evaluated in accordance with the quantification of the economic impact of Cellnex's Global Risk Management methodology, which establishes that an economic impact of <1% of revenue is low.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 50%
- Provide a detailed account of the anticipated financial effects arising from material biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities. Include a description of the effects considered, the associated impacts and dependencies, and the time horizons within which these are expected to materialize.
-
Question Id: E4-6_03
The anticipated financial effects are considered to have a low potential financial impact for the Company. The risks and opportunities are evaluated in accordance with Cellnex's Global Risk Management methodology, which establishes that an economic impact of <1% of revenue is low. The time horizons are defined as short-term (0 to 5 years), medium-term (5 to 10 years), and long-term (more than 10 years).
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 60%
- Provide a detailed account of the critical assumptions utilized in estimating the anticipated financial effects of material risks and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystem impacts and dependencies. Include the sources and the degree of uncertainty associated with these assumptions.
-
Question Id: E4-6_04
All the risks mentioned in the table are considered to have a low potential financial impact for the Company, having been evaluated in accordance with the quantification of the economic impact of Cellnex's Global Risk Management methodology, which establishes that an economic impact of <1% of revenue is low.
Report Date: 4Q2024Relevance: 35%